GhostKnockoff inference empowers identification of putative causal variants in genome-wide association studies.
GhostKnockoff inference empowers identification of putative causal variants in genome-wide association studies.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41467-022-34932-z
复制
发表时间:
2022-11-23
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Ionita-Laza, Iuliana
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
He, Zihuai;Liu, Linxi;Belloy, Michael E.;Le Guen, Yann;Sossin, Aaron;Liu, Xiaoxia;Qi, Xinran;Ma, Shiyang;Gyawali, Prashnna K.;Wyss-Coray, Tony;Tang, Hua;Sabatti, Chiara;Candes, Emmanuel;Greicius, Michael D.;Ionita-Laza, Iuliana
Recent advances in genome sequencing and imputation technologies provide an exciting opportunity to comprehensively study the contribution of genetic variants to complex phenotypes. However, our ability to translate genetic discoveries into mechanistic insights remains limited at this point. In this paper, we propose an efficient knockoff-based method, GhostKnockoff, for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that leads to improved power and ability to prioritize putative causal variants relative to conventional GWAS approaches. The method requires only Z-scores from conventional GWAS and hence can be easily applied to enhance existing and future studies. The method can also be applied to meta-analysis of multiple GWAS allowing for arbitrary sample overlap. We demonstrate its performance using empirical simulations and two applications: (1) a meta-analysis for Alzheimer’s disease comprising nine overlapping large-scale GWAS, whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing studies and (2) analysis of 1403 binary phenotypes from the UK Biobank data in 408,961 samples of European ancestry. Our results demonstrate that GhostKnockoff can identify putatively functional variants with weaker statistical effects that are missed by conventional association tests. The authors present GhostKnockoff, a method for genome-wide association studies which can be applied to enhance existing and future studies to identify functional variants with weaker statistical effects that might be missed by conventional association tests.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Hosp, Fabian;Vossfeldt, Hannes;Heinig, Matthias;Vasiljevic, Djordje;Arumughan, Anup;Wyler, Emanuel;Landthaler, Markus;Hubner, Norbert;Wanker, Erich E.;Lannfelt, Lars;Ingelsson, Martin;Lalowski, Maciej;Voigt, Aaron;Selbach, Matthias
通讯作者:
Selbach, Matthias
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Boyle EA;Li YI;Pritchard JK
通讯作者:
Pritchard JK
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Gussow AB;Copeland BR;Dhindsa RS;Wang Q;Petrovski S;Majoros WH;Allen AS;Goldstein DB
通讯作者:
Goldstein DB
影响因子:
11
作者:
Bis JC;Jian X;Kunkle BW;Chen Y;Hamilton-Nelson KL;Bush WS;Salerno WJ;Lancour D;Ma Y;Renton AE;Marcora E;Farrell JJ;Zhao Y;Qu L;Ahmad S;Amin N;Amouyel P;Beecham GW;Below JE;Campion D;Cantwell L;Charbonnier C;Chung J;Crane PK;Cruchaga C;Cupples LA;Dartigues JF;Debette S;Deleuze JF;Fulton L;Gabriel SB;Genin E;Gibbs RA;Goate A;Grenier-Boley B;Gupta N;Haines JL;Havulinna AS;Helisalmi S;Hiltunen M;Howrigan DP;Ikram MA;Kaprio J;Konrad J;Kuzma A;Lander ES;Lathrop M;Lehtimäki T;Lin H;Mattila K;Mayeux R;Muzny DM;Nasser W;Neale B;Nho K;Nicolas G;Patel D;Pericak-Vance MA;Perola M;Psaty BM;Quenez O;Rajabli F;Redon R;Reitz C;Remes AM;Salomaa V;Sarnowski C;Schmidt H;Schmidt M;Schmidt R;Soininen H;Thornton TA;Tosto G;Tzourio C;van der Lee SJ;van Duijn CM;Valladares O;Vardarajan B;Wang LS;Wang W;Wijsman E;Wilson RK;Witten D;Worley KC;Zhang X;Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project;Bellenguez C;Lambert JC;Kurki MI;Palotie A;Daly M;Boerwinkle E;Lunetta KL;Destefano AL;Dupuis J;Martin ER;Schellenberg GD;Seshadri S;Naj AC;Fornage M;Farrer LA
通讯作者:
Farrer LA
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Karczewski, Konrad J;Francioli, Laurent C;MacArthur, Daniel G
通讯作者:
MacArthur, Daniel G