Reply to Wager et al.: Pain and the dACC: The importance of hit rate-adjusted effects and posterior probabilities with fair priors
Reply to Wager et al.: Pain and the dACC: The importance of hit rate-adjusted effects and posterior probabilities with fair priors
复制标题
回复 Wager 等人：Pain 和 dACC：命中率调整效应和具有公平先验的后验概率的重要性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
11.1
通讯作者：
N. Eisenberger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matthew D. Lieberman;Shannon M Burns;Jared B. Torre;N. Eisenberger
在过去的半个世纪，多个物种的损伤和单单位记录研究集中在背侧前扣带皮层（dACC）作为疼痛处理的中心（1）。我们的回应（i）确定了Wager等人的缺陷。的分析（8），低估了dACC的疼痛的贡献，（ii）提出dACC范围的后验概率分析，提供进一步的证据表明，疼痛是一个更好的帐户dACC功能比执行，冲突，或显着的过程。关于我们使用Z分数、选择性的正确定义以及是否可以根据特定功能对神经区域进行分类的问题在其他地方得到了解决（https：//www.psychologytoday.com/blog/social-brain-social-mind/201601/more-evidence-pain-related-prediction-dacc）。
Over the last half century, lesion and single-unit recording studies across multiple species converge on the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) as central to pain processing (1⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–7). Our response (i) identifies a flaw in Wager et al.’s analysis (8) that underestimates the dACC’s contribution to pain and (ii) presents dACC-wide posterior probability analyses that provide further evidence that pain is a better account of dACC function than executive, conflict, or salience processes. Issues regarding our use of Z-scores, the proper definition of selectivity, and whether one can categorize a neural region in terms of a particular function are addressed elsewhere (https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/social-brain-social-mind/201601/more-evidence-pain-related-description-dacc).
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
SIKES, RW;VOGT, BA
通讯作者：
VOGT, BA