Noise-Induced Hearing Threshold Shift Correlated with Body Weight and External-Ear Amplification in Chinchilla: a Preliminary Analysis.
Noise-Induced Hearing Threshold Shift Correlated with Body Weight and External-Ear Amplification in Chinchilla: a Preliminary Analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s10162-023-00913-2
复制
发表时间:
2023-12
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
External-ear amplification (EEA) has been shown to vary from 5–19 dB-A in large datasets of pediatric, adolescent, and adult human participants. However, variable EEA is an overlooked characteristic that likely plays a role in individual noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) susceptibility. A noise exposure varying 5–19 dB-A translates to high-EEA individuals theoretically experiencing 3–4 times greater NIHL risk than low-EEA individuals. The purpose of this preliminary analysis was to test the hypothesis that higher EEA is correlated with increased noise-induced threshold shift susceptibility. Nine chinchillas were exposed to 4-kHz octave-band noise at 89 dB-SPL for 24 h. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were obtained pre-exposure, 24-h post-exposure, and 4-week post-exposure. Relationships between EEA and threshold shift were analyzed. Open-ear EEA ranged 11–19 dB-SPL, and occluded-ear EEA ranged 10–21 dB-SPL. Higher occluded-ear EEA was correlated with increased NIHL susceptibility (p = 0.04), as was lower body weight (p = 0.01). Male animals exhibited more threshold shift than female animals (p = 0.02), lower body weight than female animals (p = 0.02), and higher occluded-ear EEA (male mean = 18 dB; female mean = 15 dB). Taken together, increased threshold shift susceptibility was observed in the smallest animals, animals with the highest occluded-ear EEA, and in male animals (which tended to have higher occluded-ear EEA). Given the established relationship between smaller body size and higher occluded-ear EEA, these preliminary results suggest that body size (and occluded-ear EEA; a function of body size) could be a potential, underlying driver of NIHL susceptibility differences, rather than true sex differences.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
DRESCHER, DG;ELDREDGE, DH
通讯作者:
ELDREDGE, DH
DOI:
10.1007/s10162-010-0242-3
发表时间:
2011-04-01
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Jones, Heath G.;Koka, Kanthaiah;Tollin, Daniel J.
通讯作者:
Tollin, Daniel J.
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Koka, Kanthaiah;Jones, Heath G.;Tollin, Daniel J.
通讯作者:
Tollin, Daniel J.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
GERHARDT, KJ;RODRIGUEZ, GP;MOUL, ML
通讯作者:
MOUL, ML
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Grinn, Sarah K.;Le Prell, Colleen G.
通讯作者:
Le Prell, Colleen G.