Preclinical testing platforms for mechanical thrombectomy in stroke: a review on phantoms, in-vivo animal, and cadaveric models.
Preclinical testing platforms for mechanical thrombectomy in stroke: a review on phantoms, in-vivo animal, and cadaveric models.
复制标题
卒中机械血栓清除的临床前测试平台:模体、活体动物和身体模型的综述。
DOI:
10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017133
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Savastano L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu Y;Abbasi M;Arturo Larco JL;Kadirvel R;Kallmes DF;Brinjikji W;Savastano L
Preclinical testing platforms have been instrumental in the research and development of thrombectomy devices. However, there is no single model which fully captures the complexity of cerebrovascular anatomy, physiology, and the dynamic artery-clot-device interaction. This paper provides a critical review of phantoms, in-vivo animal, and human cadaveric models used for thrombectomy testing and provides insights into the strengths and limitations of each platform. Articles published in the last ten years that reported thrombectomy testing platforms were identified. Characteristics of each test platform, such as intracranial anatomy, artery tortuosity, vessel friction, flow conditions, device-vessel interaction, and visualization, were captured and benchmarked against human cerebral vessels involved in large vessel occlusion stroke. Thrombectomy phantoms have been constructed from silicone, direct 3D-printed polymers, and glass. These phantoms represent oversimplified patient-specific cerebrovascular geometry but enable adequate visualization of devices and clots under appropriate flow conditions. They do not realistically mimic the artery-clot interaction. For the animal models, arteries from swine, canines, and rabbits have been reported. These models can reasonably replicate the artery-clot-device interaction and have the unique value of evaluating the safety of thrombectomy devices. However, the vasculature geometries are substantially less complex and flow conditions are different from human cerebral arteries. Cadaveric models are the most accurate vascular representations but with limited access and challenges in reproducibility of testing conditions. Multiple test platforms should be likely used for comprehensive evaluation of thrombectomy devices. Interpretation of the testing results should take into consideration platform-specific limitations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Chueh JY;Puri AS;Wakhloo AK;Gounis MJ
通讯作者:
Gounis MJ
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Jiang, Yongjun;Li, Yun;Liu, Xinfeng
通讯作者:
Liu, Xinfeng
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Brooks, Olivia W.;King, Robert M.;Gounis, Matthew J.
通讯作者:
Gounis, Matthew J.
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Gounis, Matthew J.;Nogueira, Raul G.;Wakhloo, Ajay K.
通讯作者:
Wakhloo, Ajay K.
DOI:
10.1117/12.2042266
发表时间:
2014-03-13
期刊:
Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
影响因子:
--
作者:
Ionita CN;Mokin M;Varble N;Bednarek DR;Xiang J;Snyder KV;Siddiqui AH;Levy EI;Meng H;Rudin S
通讯作者:
Rudin S