Practices of Illegalisation

Practices of Illegalisation
复制标题

非法化的做法

DOI:
10.1111/anti.12602
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Ananya Roy
Ananya Roy
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Genova;Ananya Roy

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这篇文章有助于理论化的移民和难民流动的非法化作为立法或边境警务和移民执法的其他国家做法的影响和非法化的权利,索赔和少数民族公民的司法地位之间的经常未被承认的连续性。在右翼民族主义复苏的背景下,我们对国家非法化的做法进行了横向分析,不仅要注意劳工的从属地位和可处置性,还要注意法律与恐怖之间更根本的关系。这种公民制度的形成显然发生在民族国家领土表面上的外缘。它们也被复制在各种空间安排中,这些安排确保了全球城市中种族化的剥夺,这些城市更好地被理解为定居者殖民城市的重新配置。我们认为,非法化的做法的研究,使关键的贫困奖学金,以更好地辨别社会政治类别和分类,是中央更广泛的边缘化和统治的过程可能会出现或加强国家的非法性的法律的产品的影响。
This article contributes to theorising the often unrecognised continuities between the illegalisation of migrant and refugee mobilities as an effect of lawmaking or other state practices of border policing and immigration law enforcement and the illegalisation of the rights, claims, and juridical status of minoritised citizens. Against a backdrop of resurgent right-wing nationalisms, we pursue this transversal analysis of state practices of illegalisation to draw attention not only to labour subordination and disposability but also the more fundamental relationship between law and terror. The making of such regimes of citizenship takes place in obvious ways at the ostensible outer edges of nation-state territories. They are also replicated in the various spatial arrangements that ensure racialised dispossession within global cities, cities that are better understood as reconfigurations of settler-colonial cities. We argue that the study of practices of illegalisation allows critical poverty scholarship to better discern how sociopolitical categories and classifications that are central to wider processes of marginalisation and domination may arise or be reinforced as effects of the state’s legal productions of illegality.
世界级愿望、城市非正规性和贫困政治:南北比较
DOI: 10.1111/anti.12601
发表时间: 2020
期刊: Antipode
影响因子: 5
作者:
Sheppard, Eric;Sparks, Tony;Leitner, Helga
通讯作者: Leitner, Helga