Rethinking Sovereignty: Independence-lite, devolution-max and national accommodation
Rethinking Sovereignty: Independence-lite, devolution-max and national accommodation
复制标题
反思主权：轻独立、最大限度权力下放和国家包容
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Keating
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Keating
民族自决并不一定意味着独立。历史上，欧洲的许多国籍运动都要求与东道国保持联系。而非民族主义政党则往往接受各种形式的权力下放。这开辟了一个中间地带，以“独立精简”或“权力下放最大”的形式，这将使国家控制大多数国内政策。魁北克、加泰罗尼亚、巴斯克地区和苏格兰都提出了关于这些方针的建议。这将使无国籍国家能够达成不同的社会和经济妥协。他们不会让他们控制宏观经济政策的杠杆。它们将需要与国家建立双边关系。这些建议没有得到多数国家的支持，最近的辩论的特点是相当传统的主权主张，与我们相互依存的世界不一致。
National self-determination does not necessarily entail independence. Many nationality movements in Europe have historically called for a continued association with the host state. Non-nationalist parties, in turn, have often embraced various forms of devolution. This has opened up a middle ground, in the form of ‘independence-lite’ or ‘devolution max’, which would give nations control of most domestic policy. Proposals on these lines have been put forward in Quebec, Catalonia, the Basque Country and Scotland. These would allow stateless nations to strike distinct social and economic compromises. They would not give them control over the levers of macro-economic policy. They would entail a bilateral relationship with the state. Such proposals have not found favour with state majorities, and recent debates have been characterized by rather traditional assertions of sovereignty at odds with our interdependent world.
政治自治和分裂的社会
DOI：
10.1057/9780230365322_2
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Keating M
通讯作者：
Keating M