Holding on to Legalism: The Politics of Russian Litigation on Torture and Discrimination Before the European Court of Human Rights
Holding on to Legalism: The Politics of Russian Litigation on Torture and Discrimination Before the European Court of Human Rights
复制标题
坚持法制主义：俄罗斯在欧洲人权法院就酷刑和歧视提起诉讼的政治
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Freek van der Vet
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Freek van der Vet
俄罗斯非政府组织越来越多地通过向欧洲人权法院提起诉讼来寻求国内变革。俄罗斯政府的目标是减少这些申请的数量，并限制这些非政府组织的活动。在俄罗斯，法律主义经常被执行，但很少交付，非政府组织参与宣传，以补充其国际诉讼。然而，在新的限制立法下，倡导国内政策变化对非政府组织来说具有潜在的危险。通过对俄罗斯人权工作者的采访，本文分析了两个非政府组织-反歧视中心纪念馆和禁止酷刑委员会-如何在他们的信念，即法律可以影响到变化和必要性，以补充他们的诉讼与其他战略之间的工作。特别是，它分析了国家和非政府组织之间的相互作用，首先，非政府组织如何在法院前调动索赔作为争端的杠杆，第二，如何限制…
Russian nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) increasingly pursue domestic change by litigating before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The Russian government aims to decrease the amount of these applications and curtail the activities of these NGOs. In Russia, where legalism is often performed but sparsely delivered, NGOs engage into advocacy to supplement their international litigation. Advocating for domestic policy changes has, however, become potentially dangerous for NGOs under new curtailing legislation. Through interviews with Russian human rights practitioners, this article analyzes how two NGOs – the Anti-Discrimination Centre Memorial and the Committee against Torture – work in between their belief that law can effect into change and the necessity to supplement their litigation with other strategies. In particular, it analyzes the interactions between the state and the NGOs by examining, first, how NGOs mobilize claims before the Court as leverage in disputes, and second, how a restri...
人权事业：对联合国酷刑、法律和道德的质疑
影响因子：
1.2
作者：
KELLY T
通讯作者：
KELLY T