Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations.
Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/20008198.2020.1822064
复制
发表时间：
2020-11-10
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Koenen KC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Denckla CA;Cicchetti D;Kubzansky LD;Seedat S;Teicher MH;Williams DR;Koenen KC
背景：抵抗不利后果的能力，或在暴露于创伤后表现出韧性的能力是一个蓬勃发展的研究领域。然而，关于韧性的定义、现有文献的概括性、神经生物学相关性和共识研究议程的争论仍在继续。目标：为了解决这些紧迫的问题，Christy Denckla博士和Karestein Koenen博士(联合主席)在国际创伤应激研究学会(ISTSS)2019年年会上召集了一个多学科小组，成员包括Dante Cicchetti博士、Laura Kubzansky博士、Soraya Seedat博士、Martin Teicher博士和David Williams博士。问题包括(1)复原力的定义是如何演变的，(2)什么是捕捉复原力过程复杂性的最佳方法，以及(3)未来研究最重要的领域是什么？方法：本报告总结了该小组的会议记录，并对突出主题进行了综合和综合。结果：虽然出现了不同的定义，但所有人都关注于在多个层面上概念化复原力，从生物学层面到社会结构层面，关注复原力的动态性质，并从将复原力概念化为仅仅是个人特征的转变。未来研究的关键领域包括1)集中努力改进具有国际和跨文化有效性的评估；2)开发采用更密集表型策略的研究内设计；3)检查多个水平和领域的结果；以及4)在人口健康水平将复原力的概念化从个人水平整合到更大的社会背景。结论：日益复杂和微妙的概念框架，再加上利用遗传学、分子生物学、计算能力的提高和更大、更多样化的数据集的研究，表明下一个十年的研究可能会带来重大突破。·心理复原力领域的特点是对定义、概括性和研究议程的持续辩论。·不断变化的定义都侧重于在多个层面上概念化复原力，关注动态过程，摆脱个人特质概念化。·未来研究建议包括改进跨文化评估，采用研究内设计，并在多个水平和领域检查结果。
Background: The ability to resist adverse outcomes, or demonstrate resilience after exposure to trauma is a thriving field of study. Yet ongoing debate persists regarding definitions of resilience, generalizability of the extant literature, neurobiological correlates, and a consensus research agenda. Objectives: To address these pressing questions, Drs. Christy Denckla and Karestan Koenen (co-chairs) convened a multidisciplinary panel including Drs. Dante Cicchetti, Laura Kubzansky, Soraya Seedat, Martin Teicher, and David Williams at the 2019 annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). Questions included (1) how have definitions of resilience evolved, (2) what are the best approaches to capture the complexity of resilience processes, and (3) what are the most important areas for future research? Methods: The proceedings of this panel are summarized in this report, and prominent themes are synthesized and integrated. Results: While different definitions emerged, all shared a focus on conceptualizing resilience at multiple levels, from the biological to the social structural level, a focus on the dynamic nature of resilience, and a move away from conceptualizing resilience as only an individual trait. Critical areas for future research included 1) focused efforts to improve assessment that has international and cross-cultural validity, 2) developing within-study designs that employ more intensive phenotyping strategies, 3) examining outcomes across multiple levels and domains, and 4) integrating conceptualizations of resilience from the individual-level to the larger social context at the population health level. Conclusion: Increasingly sophisticated and nuanced conceptual frameworks, coupled with research leveraging advances in genetics, molecular biology, increased computational capacity, and larger, more diverse datasets suggest that the next decade of research could bring significant breakthroughs. • The field of psychological resilience is characterized by ongoing debate over definitions, generalizability, and a research agenda.•Evolving definitions share a focus on conceptualizing resilience at multiple levels, a focus on dynamic processes, and moving away from individual trait conceptualizations.• Future research recommendations include improving assessment cross-culturally, employing within-study designs, and examining outcomes at multiple levels and domains.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5
作者：
Magruder KM;McLaughlin KA;Elmore Borbon DL
通讯作者：
Elmore Borbon DL
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Brody, Gene H.;Lei, Man-Kit;Beach, Steven R. H.
通讯作者：
Beach, Steven R. H.
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1914655117
发表时间：
2020-02-11
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Dudek, Katarzyna A.;Dion-Albert, Laurence;Menard, Caroline
通讯作者：
Menard, Caroline
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Belsky, Jay;Pluess, Michael
通讯作者：
Pluess, Michael
影响因子：
10.5
作者：
Kessler, Ronald C.;McLaughlin, Katie A.;Williams, David R.
通讯作者：
Williams, David R.