Quantifying co-benefits and disbenefits of nature-based solutions targeting Disaster Risk Reduction

Quantifying co-benefits and disbenefits of nature-based solutions targeting Disaster Risk Reduction
复制标题

量化旨在减少灾害风险的基于自然的解决方案的共同效益和弊端

DOI:
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102966
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
S. Di Sabatino
S. Di Sabatino
中科院分区:
地球科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Joy Ommer;E. Bucchignani;L. Leo;M. Kalas;Sasa Vranic;Sisay E. Debele;Prashant Kumar;H. Cloke;S. Di Sabatino

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

基于自然的解决方案作为基于生态系统的方法的总括概念,是减少灾害风险的传统工程解决方案的替代方案。它们越来越受欢迎的部分原因是它们为环境、社会和经济带来了额外的好处(所谓的协同效益)。现有的少数协同效益评估框架缺乏国家统计局选择和许可流程所需的协同效益预评估指导。除此之外,本文还制定了对国家统计局应对减少灾害风险的潜在协同效益和弊端进行定量预评估的综合指南。它基于 NBS 和相关学科现有文献的方法和框架。此外,本文还对预评估的量化结果的评价进行了讨论。评估尤其侧重于估计的协同效益和弊端变化的显着性以及国家统计局的可持续性。本文将支持基于自然的解决方案的适用性和可持续性的规划过程中的决策,并协助准备项目的环境影响评估。
Nature-based Solutions function as an umbrella concept for ecosystem-based approaches that are an alternative to traditional engineering solutions for Disaster Risk Reduction. Their rising popularity is explained partly by their entailing additional benefits (so called co-benefits) for the environment, society, and economy. The few existing frameworks for assessing co-benefits are lacking guidance on co-benefit pre-assessment that is required for the NBS selection and permission process. Going beyond these, this paper develops a comprehensive guidance on quantitative pre-assessment of potential co-benefits and disbenefits of NBS tackling Disaster Risk Reduction. It is based on methods and frameworks from existing literature around NBS and related disciplines. Furthermore, this paper discusses the evaluation of the quantified results of the pre-assessment. In particular, the evaluation focuses on the significance of change of the estimated co-benefits and disbenefits as well as the sustainability of the NBS. This paper will support decision-making in planning processes on suitability and sustainability of Nature-based Solutions and assist in the preparation of Environmental Impact Assessments of projects.
DOI: 10.3390/su9010149
发表时间: 2017-01
期刊: Sustainability
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Yangang Xing;P. Jones;I. Donnison
通讯作者: Yangang Xing;P. Jones;I. Donnison