'Undoing a knot': a qualitative study of massed 1-week Cognitive Processing Therapy.
'Undoing a knot': a qualitative study of massed 1-week Cognitive Processing Therapy.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/20008066.2023.2205126
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Held, Philip
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kovacevic, Merdijana;Tharaud, Jessica B.;Montes, Mauricio;Mundle, Rhea S.;Splaine, Cailan C.;Silverberg, Jared;Pridgen, Sarah A.;Werner, Brianna;Held, Philip
Introduction: Intensive or massed Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been found to result in significant PTSD symptom reductions. However, few studies to date have used qualitative approaches to systematically evaluate client reflections about massed treatment approaches for PTSD. To address this gap, the present study aimed to improve our understanding of trauma survivors’ reflections following the completion of 1-week CPT. Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with seven trauma survivors within 3-months of the completion of 1-week CPT. We used the scissor-and-sort technique to identify themes and subthemes in the qualitative data. Results: Using the scissor-and-sort technique, we generated five main themes and associated subthemes from the data. The main themes were: (a) tangible skills, (b) feasibility, (c) therapeutic process, (d) symptom presentation, and (e) treatment expectations. Conclusion: Collectively, our results suggested that 1-week CPT was feasible and led to changes in PTSD symptoms and improved cognitive and affective coping skills. Scant research has examined client reflections about massed treatment approaches for PTSD. Among participants who completed a semi-structured interview about their experiences with 1-week CPT for PTSD, we generated five themes: (a) tangible skills, (b) feasibility, (c) therapeutic process, (d) symptom presentation, and (e) treatment expectations. Collectively, our results suggested that 1-week CPT was feasible and led to changes in PTSD symptoms and improved cognitive and affective coping skills.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
Resick, Patricia A.;Williams, Lauren F.;Suvak, Michael K.;Monson, Candice M.;Gradus, Jairnie L.
通讯作者:
Gradus, Jairnie L.
影响因子:
0.5
作者:
Held, Philip;Bagley, Jenna M.;Pollack, Mark H.
通讯作者:
Pollack, Mark H.
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Hundt, Natalie E.;Ecker, Anthony H.;Cully, Jeffrey A.
通讯作者:
Cully, Jeffrey A.
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Hegarty, Siobhan;Ehntholt, Kimberly;Bloomfield, Michael
通讯作者:
Bloomfield, Michael
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Morris, Kris L.;Schwartz, Carey;Wachen, Jennifer Schuster
通讯作者:
Wachen, Jennifer Schuster