Genome-wide association study of response to cognitive-behavioural therapy in children with anxiety disorders.
Genome-wide association study of response to cognitive-behavioural therapy in children with anxiety disorders.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1192/bjp.bp.115.168229
复制
发表时间:
2016-09
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Eley TC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Coleman JR;Lester KJ;Keers R;Roberts S;Curtis C;Arendt K;Bögels S;Cooper P;Creswell C;Dalgleish T;Hartman CA;Heiervang ER;Hötzel K;Hudson JL;In-Albon T;Lavallee K;Lyneham HJ;Marin CE;Meiser-Stedman R;Morris T;Nauta MH;Rapee RM;Schneider S;Schneider SC;Silverman WK;Thastum M;Thirlwall K;Waite P;Wergeland GJ;Breen G;Eley TC
Background Anxiety disorders are common, and cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) is a first-line treatment. Candidate gene studies have suggested a genetic basis to treatment response, but findings have been inconsistent. Aims To perform the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) of psychological treatment response in children with anxiety disorders (n = 980). Method Presence and severity of anxiety was assessed using semi-structured interview at baseline, on completion of treatment (post-treatment), and 3 to 12 months after treatment completion (follow-up). DNA was genotyped using the Illumina Human Core Exome-12v1.0 array. Linear mixed models were used to test associations between genetic variants and response (change in symptom severity) immediately post-treatment and at 6-month follow-up. Results No variants passed a genome-wide significance threshold (P = 5 × 10−8) in either analysis. Four variants met criteria for suggestive significance (P<5 × 10−6) in association with response post-treatment, and three variants in the 6-month follow-up analysis. Conclusions This is the first genome-wide therapygenetic study. It suggests no common variants of very high effect underlie response to CBT. Future investigations should maximise power to detect single-variant and polygenic effects by using larger, more homogeneous cohorts.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
通讯作者:
--
DOI:
10.1177/0269881113495118
发表时间:
2013-09
期刊:
Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Fineberg NA;Haddad PM;Carpenter L;Gannon B;Sharpe R;Young AH;Joyce E;Rowe J;Wellsted D;Nutt DJ;Sahakian BJ
通讯作者:
Sahakian BJ
影响因子:
9.2
作者:
Chang CC;Chow CC;Tellier LC;Vattikuti S;Purcell SM;Lee JJ
通讯作者:
Lee JJ
影响因子:
11
作者:
Bosker, F. J.;Hartman, C. A.;Nolen, W. A.
通讯作者:
Nolen, W. A.
DOI:
10.1016/j.jaac.2015.03.018
发表时间:
2015-06
影响因子:
13.3
作者:
Hudson, Jennifer L.;Keers, Robert;Roberts, Susanna;Coleman, Jonathan R. I.;Breen, Gerome;Arendt, Kristian;Boegels, Susan;Cooper, Peter;Creswell, Cathy;Hartman, Catharina;Heiervang, Einar R.;Hoetzel, Katrin;In-Albon, Tina;Lavallee, Kristen;Lyne-Ham, Heidi J.;Marin, Carla E.;McKinnon, Anna;Meiser-Stedman, Richard;Morris, Talia;Nauta, Maaike;Rapee, Ronald M.;Schneider, Silvia;Schneider, Sophie C.;Silverman, Wendy K.;Thastum, Mikael;Thirlwall, Kerstin;Waite, Polly;Wergeland, Gro Janne;Lester, Kathryn J.;Eley, Thalia C.
通讯作者:
Eley, Thalia C.