What determines technological hits? Geography vs. firm competencies

What determines technological hits? Geography vs. firm competencies
复制标题

是什么决定了技术的成功?

DOI:
10.1016/j.respol.2004.08.004
复制
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mariani Myriam
Mariani Myriam
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mariani Myriam

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

公司维斯维斯区域的中心地位突出了两种创新模式之间的一般对比。本文使用了一个新的数据库组成的4262欧洲化学专利申请的693家公司在1987年至1996年期间,比较生产的技术“命中”(高被引专利)的企业和区域特征的相对影响。通过使用广泛的控制,本文的主要发现是,在“传统”化学部门的技术命中只解释了在公司一级的研发强度和研究项目的规模。公司的能力,特别是技术专业化,在生物技术领域仍然很重要。然而,生物技术模式的显著特点是,本地化的知识溢出也很重要。
The centrality of firms vis-à-vis regions underlines a general contrast between two models of producing innovations. This paper uses a new database composed of 4262 European chemical patents applied by 693 firms during 1987–1996 to compare the relative effect of firm and regional characteristics on the production of technological “hits” (highly cited patents). By using extensive controls, the main finding of the paper is that technological hits in the “traditional” chemical sectors are explained only by R&D intensity at the firm level and the scale of the research projects. Firm competencies, particularly technological specialisation, are still important in biotechnology. However, the distinct feature of the biotechnology model is that localised knowledge spillovers also matter.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
发表时间: 2004-04-01
期刊: ECONOMIC JOURNAL
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Lanjouw, JO;Schankeman, M
通讯作者: Schankeman, M
DOI: 10.2307/365972
发表时间: 1994-03
期刊: The New England Quarterly
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Chandler;A. Saxenian
通讯作者: A. Chandler;A. Saxenian