Direct fluorescence monitoring of DNA base excision repair.
Direct fluorescence monitoring of DNA base excision repair.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/anie.201108135
复制
发表时间:
2012-02-13
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Kool, Eric T.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ono, Toshikazu;Wang, Shenliang;Koo, Chi-Kin;Engstrom, Lisa;David, Sheila S.;Kool, Eric T.
Uracil is an undesired component of DNA, as it arises from spontaneous deamination of cytosine.[1] This hydrolysis reaction promotes mutations, since the resulting U–G pair can be misread during DNA replication. As a result, multiple cellular enzymes have evolved to detect uracil in DNA and remove it prior to replication.[2] In E. coli uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) enzyme functions to guard the bacterial genome. In humans, similar enzyme activities exist, including the proteins UNG1/2, SMUG, and TDG.[3] These enzymes flip uracil out of the DNA helix and cleave it from its deoxyribose sugar, leaving an abasic site in its place.[4] Chemical sensors of UDG enzymes could be useful in multiple respects. Mechanistic studies of the enzymes can benefit from such probes.[5] In addition, if such probes could function in cells, they could be used to screen activity of enzyme mutants, and to probe biological regulation of DNA repair pathways. Finally, inhibitors of DNA repair enzymes are currently receiving intense interest in anticancer therapeutic approaches;[6] thus simple light-up reporters of such enzymes could be also useful in screening drug candidates. Previous efforts to develop fluorescent sensors for uracilglycosylase enzymes have been limited by large size, by their indirect readout and by poor performance. Designs have generally relied on large duplex DNA constructs of 28–39 nucleotides.[7] Signals were generated by changes in conformation (loss of duplex structure) which results after uracil is removed and the DNA strand is ultimately cleaved. Signal enhancements of 4-to 8-fold were reported; these signals report only indirectly on the uracil deglycosylation because they require subsequent steps of DNA degradation and/or unwinding before the signal is seen. Although such DNA constructs were able to function in vitro, function of such structures in biological media such as cell extracts can be further complicated by false signals from DNA-unwinding activities in the cell, from nuclease degradation, and from other DNA-binding proteins (such as single-strand-binding proteins) that can all lead to loss of duplex integrity. Although one previous report describes signals generated in mammalian cells with a 39-base DNA construct,[7a] control experiments to rule out these likely sources of background signal were not performed. Finally, the large size of such constructs adds cost, complexity and lowers the likelihood of intracellular uptake.It has been known for some time that UDG enzymes also show activity on single-stranded DNAs.[8] One earlier report described an in vitro kinetics assay for E. coli UDG making use of double-and single-stranded DNAs containing the fluorescent dye 2-aminopurine (2AP), which is quenched in DNA; increases in fluorescence of 3-to 8-fold were reported with UDG.[9] 2AP deoxynucleoside is a convenient probe in DNA as it stacks like a DNA base; however, it has low fluorescence efficiency and emits in the UV region.[10] Our aim was to construct sensors for UDG activity that are simpler, smaller and more effective than previous examples. As part of a program to build enzyme sensors from small synthetic DNA oligomers containing fluorescent DNA base replacements,[11] we observed that the fluorophore pyrene is especially well quenched by the DNA base thymine, a phenomenon that occurs by the photoinduced charge transfer (PICT) mechanism.[12] Pyrene is especially useful as a fluorophore because it has a high quantum yield, robust brightness, and is shifted to the red by ca. 40 nm relative to 2AP, allowing for detection in the visible region. Pyrene deoxyriboside (Y), an nonnatural DNA nucleoside, has been used …
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Matray, TJ;Kool, ET
通讯作者:
Kool, ET
影响因子:
15
作者:
Guckian, KM;Schweitzer, BA;Kool, ET
通讯作者:
Kool, ET
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.71.9.3649
发表时间:
1974-01-01
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
LINDAHL, T
通讯作者:
LINDAHL, T
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Babu, BR;Wengel, J
通讯作者:
Wengel, J
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Jiang, YL;Stivers, JT;Song, FH
通讯作者:
Song, FH