Comparison of modic changes in the lumbar and cervical spine, in 3167 patients with and without spinal pain.
Comparison of modic changes in the lumbar and cervical spine, in 3167 patients with and without spinal pain.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0114993
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Zhao F
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sheng-yun L;Letu S;Jian C;Mamuti M;Jun-hui L;Zhi S;Chong-yan W;Shunwu F;Zhao F
There are few comparisons of Modic changes (MCs) in the lumbar and cervical spine. Compare the prevalence of MCs in the lumbar and cervical spine, and determine how MC prevalence depends on spinal pain, age, disc degeneration, spinal level, and the presence or absence of kyphosis. Retrospective clinical survey. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were compared from five patient groups: 1. 1223 patients with low-back pain/radiculopathy only; 2. 1023 patients with neck pain/radiculopathy only; 3. 497 patients with concurrent low-back and neck symptoms; 4. 304 asymptomatic subjects with lumbar MRIs; and 5. 120 asymptomatic subjects with cervical MRIs. The prevalence of MCs was higher in those with spinal pain than in those without, both in the lumbar spine (21.0% vs 10.5%) and cervical spine (8.8% vs 3.3%). Type II MCs were most common and Type III were least common in all groups. The prevalence of lumbar MCs in people with back pain was little affected by the presence of concurrent neck pain, and the same was true for the prevalence of cervical MCs in people with neck pain with or without concurrent back pain. When symptomatic patients were reclassified into two groups (back pain, neck pain), the prevalence of lumbar MCs in people with back pain was greater than that of cervical MCs in people with neck pain. The prevalence of lumbar and cervical MCs increased with age, disc degeneration, (descending) spinal level, and increased kyphosis. There is a significantly higher prevalence of MCs in patients with back and neck pain. The reported association with increased kyphosis (flat back) is novel.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3
作者:
Hutton, Michael J.;Bayer, Jens H.;Sharp, David J.
通讯作者:
Sharp, David J.
影响因子:
3
作者:
Wang, Yue;Videman, Tapio;Battie, Michele C.
通讯作者:
Battie, Michele C.
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
Wang, Yi-Xiang J.;Griffith, James F.
通讯作者:
Griffith, James F.
影响因子:
3
作者:
Mann, Eugen;Peterson, Cynthia K.;Hodler, Juerg
通讯作者:
Hodler, Juerg
影响因子:
19.7
作者:
MODIC, MT;STEINBERG, PM;CARTER, JR
通讯作者:
CARTER, JR