Amygdala Resting State Connectivity Differences between Bipolar II and Borderline Personality Disorders.
Amygdala Resting State Connectivity Differences between Bipolar II and Borderline Personality Disorders.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1159/000502440
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Gruber SA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Reich DB;Belleau EL;Temes CM;Gonenc A;Pizzagalli DA;Gruber SA
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and Bipolar II Disorder (BD II) have significant clinical overlap, leaving the potential for diagnostic inaccuracies and inadequate treatment recommendations. However, few studies have probed for clinical and neurobiological differences between the two disorders. Clinically, some prior studies have linked BPD with greater impulsivity and more frequent negative affective shifts than BD II, whereas previous neuroimaging studies have highlighted both similar and distinct neural abnormalities in BPD and BD II. Notably, no prior study has specifically targeted cortico-limbic neural differences, which have been hypothesized to underlie these core clinical differences. Individuals with BPD (n = 14) and BD II (n = 15) completed various clinical measures and a RSFC scan at 3T. Whole-brain amygdala resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) were compared between the two groups. Relative to the BD II group, BPD participants reported significantly higher levels of impulsivity, trait anxiety, more frequent negative affective shifts, greater interpersonally reactive affective instability, lower overall functioning, and were characterized by lower amygdala-middle frontal gyrus RSFC. Lower amygdala –middle frontal gyrus RSFC was associated with greater impulsivity, trait anxiety, affective shifts, interpersonal affective reactivity, and functional impairment. The current study consisted of small sample sizes and lacked a control group. This preliminary study suggests that amygdala-frontal RSFC may distinguish BPD from BD II. These results may guide future work aimed at identifying neural markers that can help disentangle these two disorders, leading to greater diagnostic accuracy and appropriate treatment implementation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Baek, Ji Hyun;Park, Dong Yeon;Hong, Kyung Sue
通讯作者:
Hong, Kyung Sue
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Schulze, Lars;Schmahl, Christian;Niedtfeld, Inga
通讯作者:
Niedtfeld, Inga
影响因子:
17.7
作者:
Frazier, JA;Chiu, SF;Biederman, J
通讯作者:
Biederman, J
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Salvador, Raymond;Vega, Daniel;Pomarol-Clotet, Edith
通讯作者:
Pomarol-Clotet, Edith
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Coccaro, Emil F.;Sripada, Chandra Sekhar;Phan, K. Luan
通讯作者:
Phan, K. Luan