Towards the Ethical Publication of Country of Origin Information (COI) in the Asylum Process

Towards the Ethical Publication of Country of Origin Information (COI) in the Asylum Process
复制标题

致力于在庇护程序中以合乎道德的方式公布原籍国信息 (COI)

DOI:
10.1007/s11023-020-09523-w
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
Aggarwal N
Aggarwal N
中科院分区:
计算机科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aggarwal N

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文讨论了如何以合乎道德的方式发布“原籍国信息”(COI)报告(即为支持庇护过程中的决策而开发和使用的研究)的问题。本文重点关注已发布的 COI 报告可能被滥用并从而损害报告主题和/或参与报告开发的人员的风险。它支持在发布 COI 报告时采用情境方法来评估数据伦理,其中 COI 服务提供商必须根据研究的潜在滥用造成损害的可预见性和可能性、研究的公共利益性质以及平衡庇护程序中各参与者(包括寻求庇护者本身)权利和义务的需要等因素,权衡发布的利弊。尽管本文关注的是“如何以合乎道德的方式发布 COI 报告”这一具体问题,但它也旨在推动庇护过程中数据伦理的进一步研究,特别是与难民有关的问题,应该考虑更多的基础性问题。
This article addresses the question of how ‘Country of Origin Information’ (COI) reports—that is, research developed and used to support decision-making in the asylum process—can be published in an ethical manner. The article focuses on the risk that published COI reports could be misused and thereby harm the subjects of the reports and/or those involved in their development. It supports a situational approach to assessing data ethics when publishing COI reports, whereby COI service providers must weigh up the benefits and harms of publication based, inter alia, on the foreseeability and probability of harm due to potential misuse of the research, the public good nature of the research, and the need to balance the rights and duties of the various actors in the asylum process, including asylum seekers themselves. Although this article focuses on the specific question of ‘how to publish COI reports in an ethical manner’, it also intends to promote further research on data ethics in the asylum process, particularly in relation to refugees, where more foundational issues should be considered.
开放获取数字数据共享:原则、政策和实践☆
DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2012.760663
发表时间: 2013
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
N. Mauthner;O. Parry
通讯作者: O. Parry
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Jasper van der Kist;Huub Dijstelbloem;M. Goede
通讯作者: M. Goede
DOI: --
发表时间: 1969
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
David C. Smith
通讯作者: David C. Smith
采取应有的谨慎:双重用途研究中的道德义务
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00695.x
发表时间: 2008
期刊: Wiley-Blackwell: Bioethics
影响因子: --
作者:
Frida Kuhlau;S. Eriksson;K. Evers;Anna T. Hoglund
通讯作者: Anna T. Hoglund
DOI: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2009.tb00145.x
发表时间: 2009-03-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Bishop, Libby
通讯作者: Bishop, Libby