The Relationship between Word Difficulty and Frequency: A Response to Hashimoto (2021)

The Relationship between Word Difficulty and Frequency: A Response to Hashimoto (2021)
复制标题

单词难度与频率之间的关系:对桥本 (2021) 的回应

DOI:
10.1080/15434303.2021.1992629
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Brandon Kramer
Brandon Kramer
中科院分区:
人文科学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jeffrey Stewart;Joseph P Vitta;Christopher Nicklin;Stuart McLean;Geoffrey G Pinchbeck;Brandon Kramer

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Hashimoto(2021)报道了词频等级和难度之间的相关性为-0.50(r2= 0.25),得出结论现代词汇量测试的结构是值得怀疑的。在这个响应中,我们表明,频率和难度之间的关系是明确的,虽然是非线性的,并证明,如果更广泛的频率进行测试,并应用对数变换,相关性可以接近.80。最后,虽然我们承认基于知识的单词列表的巨大前景,但我们注意到,难度和频率之间的强相关性实际上并不是大小测试按频率组织的主要原因。
Hashimoto (2021) reported a correlation of −.50 (r2= .25) between word frequency rank and difficulty, concluding the construct of modern vocabulary size tests is questionable. In this response we show that the relationship between frequency and difficulty is clear albeit non-linear and demonstrate that if a wider range of frequencies is tested and log transformations are applied, the correlation can approach .80. Finally, while we acknowledge the great promise of knowledge-based word lists, we note that a strong correlation between difficulty and frequency is not, in fact, the primary reason size tests are organized by frequency.
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.002
发表时间: 2018-07-01
期刊: ASSESSING WRITING
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Kim, Minkyung;Crossley, Scott A.
通讯作者: Crossley, Scott A.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
发表时间: 2016-12-01
影响因子: 6.1
作者:
Kyle, Kristopher;Crossley, Scott
通讯作者: Crossley, Scott
定量 L2 研究中的方法论综合:评论回顾和探索性因素分析案例研究
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Luke Plonsky;Talip Gonulal
通讯作者: Talip Gonulal
词汇知识模式与二语阅读能力的相关性:一种引导方法。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2019
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
McLean;S.
通讯作者: S.
DOI: 10.1080/15434303.2020.1860058
发表时间: 2021-01-20
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Hashimoto, Brett James
通讯作者: Hashimoto, Brett James