Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Valence of Evaluation and Salience of Categorization

Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Social Discrimination: Valence of Evaluation and Salience of Categorization
复制标题

社会歧视中的正负不对称:评价的效价和分类的显着性

DOI:
10.1177/0146167200262007
复制
发表时间:
2000
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
T. Kessler
T. Kessler
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Mummendey;S. Otten;U. Berger;T. Kessler

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

几项研究一致表明,群体间歧视存在正负不对称。作为一个可能的解释,这种效果,作者调查是否刺激效价有影响的社会分类,这反过来,被认为是确定的程度,组间分化的显着性。有人假设,与负性刺激的对抗煽动的自我分类的包容性水平的变化,抑制分化的基础上最初的社会分类。两项研究的因素效价(积极的,消极的)和显着性(低,高)进行了测试这些假设。结果是令人鼓舞的基于类别的解释价对社会歧视的影响。这些研究结果的经典理论在最小的群体间的情况下的行为的影响进行了讨论。
Several studies have consistently demonstrated a positive-negative asymmetry in intergroup discrimination. As a possible explanation for this effect, the authors investigated whether stimulus valence has an impact on the salience of social categorization, which, in turn, is assumed to determine the degree of intergroup differentiation. It was hypothesized that the confrontation with negative stimuli instigates a change in the level of inclusiveness of self-categorization, inhibiting the differentiation based on the initial social categorization. Two studies with factors valence (positive, negative) and salience (low, high) were conducted to test these assumptions. Results were encouraging with respect to a category-based explanation of the valence effects on social discrimination. Implications of these findings for classical theories on behavior in minimal intergroup situations are discussed.
群体间偏见:地位、差异和共同的群体内身份。
DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.109
发表时间: 1998
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Dovidio,JF;Gaertner,SL;Validzic,A
通讯作者: Validzic,A
DOI: 10.4135/9781483386874.n252
发表时间: 2019-05
影响因子: 24.8
作者:
D. Messick;D. Mackie
通讯作者: D. Messick;D. Mackie