HIV-related stigma and NGO-isation in India: a historico-empirical analysis.

HIV-related stigma and NGO-isation in India: a historico-empirical analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01428.x
复制
发表时间:
2012-06
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Nambiar D
Nambiar D
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nambiar D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

2007年,为了回应世界银行的批评,印度卫生和家庭福利部宣布,与艾滋病毒相关的耻辱是非政府组织(NGO)参与实施艾滋病毒预防针对性干预措施的障碍。本文更深入地将与艾滋病毒相关的耻辱视为一种历史性的贬值过程,详细介绍了从 1986 年到 20 世纪 90 年代的经济自由化,直至最近结束的国家艾滋病控制计划(NACP II,1999-2006)期间非政府组织参与艾滋病毒流行的历史和转变。它还检查了对德里四个由 NACP II 资助的定向干预非政府组织的非政府组织工作人员 (N=24) 的访谈和参与观察的结果。分析显示,过去二十年里,与艾滋病毒相关的非政府组织的参与如雨后春笋般涌现,为非政府组织工作人员提供了多种途径来获得印度应对这一流行病的可信度。这些途径重叠中的矛盾产生了耻辱,反映了“逆向融合”。本文借鉴了印度艾滋病相关非政府组织“第一波”这一趋势中值得注意的例外情况,呼吁非政府组织参与作为一项明确的政治项目,以解决造成耻辱和容易感染疾病的社会不平等问题。
In response to World Bank critiques in 2007, the Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare declared that HIV-related stigma was a barrier to the participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the implementation of HIV prevention Targeted Interventions. Taking a deeper view of HIV-related stigma as an historically inflected process of devaluation, this paper details the history and transformation of NGO involvement in the HIV epidemic from 1986 through economic liberalisation in the 1990s up to the recently concluded National AIDS Control Program (NACP II, 1999-2006). It additionally examines findings from interviews and participant observation of NGO workers (N=24) from four Targeted Intervention NGOs in Delhi funded under NACP II. Analysis reveals that a ‘second wave’ of HIV-related NGO involvement has mushroomed in the past two decades, affording NGO workers multiple pathways to credibility in the Indian response to the epidemic. Contradictions embedded in the overlap of these pathways produce stigma, reflecting ‘adverse incorporation.’ Drawing upon noteworthy exceptions to this trend from the ‘first wave’ of Indian HIV-related NGOs, the paper calls for NGO participation as an explicitly political project of addressing the social inequalities that shape stigma as well as vulnerability to illness writ large.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00454.x
发表时间: 2010-03-01
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Baines, Donna
通讯作者: Baines, Donna
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2004.054593
发表时间: 2005-07-01
影响因子: 12.7
作者:
Berkman, A;Garcia, J;Parker, R
通讯作者: Parker, R
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2003.028563
发表时间: 2005-01-01
影响因子: 12.7
作者:
Castro, A;Farmer, P
通讯作者: Farmer, P
DOI: 10.1215/08992363-2006-030
发表时间: 2007-12-01
期刊: PUBLIC CULTURE
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Comaroff, Jean
通讯作者: Comaroff, Jean
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007061910035
发表时间: 1999-08-01
期刊: THEORY AND SOCIETY
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Altman, D
通讯作者: Altman, D