How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice
How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice
复制标题
科学家如何定义开放？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Dupré
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nadine Levin;S. Leonelli;Dagmara Weckowska;D. Castle;J. Dupré
本文记录了英国生物医学研究人员如何理解和实践“开放”的理念。鉴于英国政府最近采取了关于开放科学和开放获取的开创性政策，这一点引起了全世界研究人员和科学政策的特别关注——这些政策对研究实践的影响和影响需要紧急评估，以便决定它们在其他地方的最终实施。这项研究基于 2013 年 9 月至 2014 年 2 月期间对英国系统生物学、合成生物学和生物信息学研究人员进行的 22 次深度访谈。通过对访谈记录的分析，我们确定了代表研究人员对科学开放性理解的七个核心主题以及影响研究开放性实践的九个因素。我们的研究结果强调了开放科学政策对研究过程和结果的影响，并为增强其内容、有效性和实施提供了建议。
This article documents how biomedical researchers in the United Kingdom understand and enact the idea of “openness.” This is of particular interest to researchers and science policy worldwide in view of the recent adoption of pioneering policies on Open Science and Open Access by the U.K. government—policies whose impact on and implications for research practice are in need of urgent evaluation, so as to decide on their eventual implementation elsewhere. This study is based on 22 in-depth interviews with U.K. researchers in systems biology, synthetic biology, and bioinformatics, which were conducted between September 2013 and February 2014. Through an analysis of the interview transcripts, we identify seven core themes that characterize researchers’ understanding of openness in science and nine factors that shape the practice of openness in research. Our findings highlight the implications that Open Science policies can have for research processes and outcomes and provide recommendations for enhancing their content, effectiveness, and implementation.
DOI：
10.1001/jama.1997.03540390054035
发表时间：
1997-04
期刊：
JAMA
影响因子：
--
作者：
D. Blumenthal;E. Campbell;Melissa S. Anderson;N. Causino;K. Louis
通讯作者：
D. Blumenthal;E. Campbell;Melissa S. Anderson;N. Causino;K. Louis