Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival.
Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1756-3305-7-65
复制
发表时间：
2014-02-12
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Brant HL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dickens BL;Brant HL
跟踪蚊子的移动和了解传播动态对于控制和预防病媒传播疾病至关重要。使用了各种标记技术，包括粉尘和染料。在这项研究中，埃及伊蚊被标记使用荧光粉尘（“DayGlo”：A-19地平线蓝和A-13-N火箭红;“Brian Clegg”：粉红色，蓝色和红色），荧光涂料（“Brian Clegg”：蓝色，红色和黄色）和金属金粉（“Brian Clegg”）。撒粉方法是以前在标记-释放-再捕获实验中使用的方法，包括使用球形除尘器、制造沙尘暴或在袋中摇动。结果显示，与未标记的对照组相比，使用沙尘暴标记蚊子允许相对较高的存活率（雄性：χ2 = 3.24，df = 4，p = 0.07;雌性：χ2 = 3.24，df = 4，p = 0.04），并且具有较高的标记效率。在研究的前15天期间，使用灯泡喷粉器显示出雄性蚊子的高存活率（χ2 = 12.59，df = 4，p < 0.000），但雌性蚊子的低存活率（χ2 = 5.17，df = 4，p < 0.05）。与其他干式打标技术相比，灯泡除尘器的打标效率也最低。袋法显示在研究的前15天期间雄性的存活率较低（χ2 = 5.77，df = 4，p < 0.05）。涂抹油漆对男性的生存率有总体负面影响（χ2 = 5.03，df = 3，p < 0.05），但对女性没有影响（χ2 = 0.19，df = 3，p = 0.661）。与对照相比，用DayGlo Horizon Blue粉尘撒粉的雄性和用DayGlo Rocket Red粉尘撒粉的雌性具有最显著的存活率降低（雄性：χ2 = 15.70，df = 6，p < 0.000;雌性：χ2 = 24.47，df = 6，p < 0.000）。用BrianClegg金尘标记的蚊子在雄性蚊子中显示与对照相似的死亡率（χ2 = 0.18，df = 6，p = 0.674），但在雌性蚊子中显著低于对照（χ2 = 16.59，df = 6，p < 0.000）。这项研究表明，标记技术和颜色会对蚊子的生存和标记覆盖范围产生显着影响。
Tracking the movement of mosquitoes and understanding dispersal dynamics is essential for the control and prevention of vector-borne diseases. A variety of marking techniques have been used, including dusts and dyes. In this study, Aedes aegypti were marked using fluorescent dusts (‘DayGlo’: A-19 Horizon Blue & A-13-N Rocket Red; ‘Brian Clegg’: pink, blue & red), fluorescent paints (‘Brian Clegg’: blue, red & yellow) and metallic gold dust (‘Brian Clegg’). Dusting methods were those previously used in mark-release-recapture experiments, including application with a bulb duster, creation of a dust storm or shaking in a bag. Results showed marking mosquitoes using a dust storm allowed relatively high survival, compared to unmarked controls (Males: χ2 = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.07; Females: χ2 = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.04), and high marking efficiency. Using a bulb duster showed high survival in male mosquitoes (χ2 = 12.59, df = 4, p < 0.000), but low survival in female mosquitoes during the first 15 days of the study (χ2 = 5.17, df = 4, p < 0.05). The bulb duster also had the lowest marking efficiency compared to other dry marking techniques. The bag method showed low survival in males during the first 15 days of the study (χ2 = 5.77, df = 4, p < 0.05). Applying paints had an overall negative impact on survival for males (χ2 = 5.03, df = 3, p < 0.05), but not for females (χ2 = 0.19, df = 3, p = 0.661). Males dusted with DayGlo Horizon Blue dust, and females dusted with DayGlo Rocket Red dust, had the most significant reduction in survivorship in comparison to the control (Males: χ2 = 15.70, df = 6, p < 0.000; Females: χ2 = 24.47, df = 6, p < 0.000). Mosquitoes marked with Brian Clegg gold dust showed mortality rates similar to controls within male mosquitoes (χ2 = 0.18, df = 6, p = 0.674), but significantly lower in females (χ2 = 16.59, df = 6, p < 0.000). This study showed that marking technique and colour can have a significant impact on the survival and marking coverage of a mosquito.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Jones CE;Lounibos LP;Marra PP;Kilpatrick AM
通讯作者：
Kilpatrick AM
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
DYE, C;DAVIES, CR;LAINSON, R
通讯作者：
LAINSON, R
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
LYSYK, TJ;AXTELL, RC
通讯作者：
AXTELL, RC
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Hoddle, M. S.;Millar, J. G.;Lesch, S. M.
通讯作者：
Lesch, S. M.
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
CONWAY, GR;TRPIS, M;MCCLELLA.GA
通讯作者：
MCCLELLA.GA