Commentary: Why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment three decades later.
Commentary: Why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment three decades later.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/ije/dyq144
复制
发表时间:
2011-06
影响因子:
7.7
通讯作者:
Plomin R
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Plomin R
The importance of non-shared environment lay hidden within quantitative genetic studies since they began nearly a century ago. Quantitative genetic methods, such as twin and adoption methods, were designed to tease apart nature and nurture in order to explain family resemblance. For nearly all complex phenotypes, it has emerged that the answer to the question of the origins of family resemblance is nature—things run in families primarily for genetic reasons. However, the best available evidence for the importance of environmental influence comes from this same quantitative genetic research because genetic influence never explains all of the variance for complex phenotypes, and the remaining variance must be ascribed to environmental influences. Yet it took many decades for the full meaning of these findings to emerge. If genetics explains why siblings growing up in the same family are similar, but the environment is important, then it must be the case that the salient environmental effects do not make siblings similar. That is, they are not shared by children growing up in the same family—they must be ‘non-shared’. This implication about non-shared environmental import lay fallow in the field of quantitative genetics because the field’s attention was then firmly on the nature–nurture debate.‘Nurture’in the nature–nurture debate was implicitly taken to mean shared environment because fromFreud onwards, theories of socialization had assumed that children’s environments are doled out on a family-by-family basis. In contrast, the point of non-shared environment is that environments are doled out on a child-by-child basis. Note that the phrase ‘non-shared environment’is shorthand for a component of phenotypic variance—it refers to ‘effects’ rather than ‘events’, as discussed later. The 1987 paper reprinted in this issue of the International Journal of Epidemiology1 brought together evidence for the importance of non-shared environment in the development of personality, psychopathology and cognitive abilities, expanding on a previous paper. 2 The purpose of the present commentary is to reflect on non-shared environment three decades after the topic emerged. Progress and problems in studying non-shared environment were reviewed in 2001; 3 rather than providing a systematic update of this burgeoning field, my current goal is to suggest some new directions for research in this area. The 1987 paper was published with 32 commentaries and our response, 4 which I recommend. These commentaries and the response to them raised many of the issues that resurfaced during the following decades, such as the following:
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Beaver, Kevin M.
通讯作者:
Beaver, Kevin M.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Asbury, K;Dunn, JF;Plomin, R
通讯作者:
Plomin, R
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Boisvert, Danielle;Wright, John Paul
通讯作者:
Wright, John Paul
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0500398102
发表时间:
2005-07-26
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Fraga, MF;Ballestar, E;Esteller, M
通讯作者:
Esteller, M
影响因子:
4
作者:
GE, XJ;CONGER, RD;ELDER, GH
通讯作者:
ELDER, GH