Perception of speaker sincerity in complex social interactions by cochlear implant users.
Perception of speaker sincerity in complex social interactions by cochlear implant users.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0269652
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
理解不真诚的语言(讽刺和取笑)是交流的基本部分，对维持社会关系至关重要。对于接受退化的超段信息的人工耳蜗术使用者来说，这可能是一项具有挑战性的任务，这些信息对于感知说话人的态度很重要。我们使用已建立的视频清单，测量了16名患有顺应性的成年人对说话者诚意的感知(字面上的积极、字面上的消极、讽刺和取笑)。参与者被呈现给两个人之间的纯音频和视听社交互动，包括支持和不支持言语环境。他们被要求描述对话的内容，并回答说话者是否真心实意。结果表明，受试者并不总是能辨别出说话者的诚意，即使对话的内容被完全理解。与真诚的话语相比，这种差距更大，因为人们感觉到的是虚假。当提供额外的视觉线索或言语语境线索时，表现会有所改善。在只有音频的情况下，更好地感知互动内容的受试者从获得额外的视觉线索来判断说话者的诚意中受益更多，这表明这两种方式竞争认知资源。对内容的感知也与对说话者诚意的感知无关，这表明所说的话与如何说的是使用无关的分段线索与超分段线索来感知的。我们的结果进一步表明，能够获得助听器在对侧耳中提供的低阶分辨谐波信息的受试者比那些只使用植入物的受试者更好地识别说话者的诚意。这些结果表明，仅对CI用户的语音识别进行衡量并不能完全描述结果。我们的研究结果强调了测量顺位患者社交功能的重要性。
Understanding insincere language (sarcasm and teasing) is a fundamental part of communication and crucial for maintaining social relationships. This can be a challenging task for cochlear implant (CIs) users who receive degraded suprasegmental information important for perceiving a speaker’s attitude. We measured the perception of speaker sincerity (literal positive, literal negative, sarcasm, and teasing) in 16 adults with CIs using an established video inventory. Participants were presented with audio-only and audio-visual social interactions between two people with and without supporting verbal context. They were instructed to describe the content of the conversation and answer whether the speakers meant what they said. Results showed that subjects could not always identify speaker sincerity, even when the content of the conversation was perfectly understood. This deficit was greater for perceiving insincere relative to sincere utterances. Performance improved when additional visual cues or verbal context cues were provided. Subjects who were better at perceiving the content of the interactions in the audio-only condition benefited more from having additional visual cues for judging the speaker’s sincerity, suggesting that the two modalities compete for cognitive recourses. Perception of content also did not correlate with perception of speaker sincerity, suggesting that what was said vs. how it was said were perceived using unrelated segmental versus suprasegmental cues. Our results further showed that subjects who had access to lower-order resolved harmonic information provided by hearing aids in the contralateral ear identified speaker sincerity better than those who used implants alone. These results suggest that measuring speech recognition alone in CI users does not fully describe the outcome. Our findings stress the importance of measuring social communication functions in people with CIs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
CLARK, HH;GERRIG, RJ
通讯作者：
GERRIG, RJ
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Anolli, L;Ciceri, R;Infantino, MG
通讯作者：
Infantino, MG
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Joergensen, Gitte Henssel;Makarla, Pavitra Rao;Rothermich, Kathrin
通讯作者：
Rothermich, Kathrin
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
KREUZ, RJ;GLUCKSBERG, S
通讯作者：
GLUCKSBERG, S
影响因子：
--
作者：
Looi, Valerie;King, Jason;Kelly-Campbell, Rebecca
通讯作者：
Kelly-Campbell, Rebecca