Feasibility and acceptability of texting school-aged adolescents to assess daily substance use among community-based black and white youth.
Feasibility and acceptability of texting school-aged adolescents to assess daily substance use among community-based black and white youth.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107455
复制
发表时间：
2022-12
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Carpenter, Ryan W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Banks, Devin E.;Brown, Kanila L.;Carpenter, Ryan W.
生态瞬时评估（EMA）非常适合衡量青少年物质使用情况。之前针对青少年（尤其是少数族裔青少年）的研究主要向参与者提供移动设备，作为减少技术获取的结构性障碍的策略。该报告研究了向青少年个人手机发送短信的 EMA 协议的可行性和可接受性。从社区环境中招募了年龄在 14-18 岁、使用手机且过去 30 天有药物使用史的非西班牙裔黑人和白人青少年。受访者（n = 36；55.5% 为女性；55.5% 为白人）完成了评估药物使用情况的 14 天日记。受访者完成了 M = 13.8 (SD = 1.36) 的日记，达标率为 93.5%。黑人受访者完成的日记（87.9%）明显少于白人受访者（97.9%），尽管两组的遵守率都很高。青少年对该方案的接受度很高，97.1% 的人愿意再次参与。研究结果表明，通过个人手机发送基于短信的 EMA 来评估青少年的物质使用情况是可以接受且可行的。随着青少年之间社会人口“数字鸿沟”的缩小，这种具有成本效益且公平的方法变得更加可行。
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is well-suited to measure adolescent substance use. Previous research with adolescents, particularly racially minoritized adolescents, has predominantly provided mobile devices to participants as a strategy to reduce structural barriers to technology access. This report examined feasibility and acceptability of a text-message-delivered EMA protocol to adolescents’ personal phones. Non-Hispanic Black and White adolescents aged 14–18 years with mobile phone access and past-30-day substance use were recruited from community settings. Respondents (n = 36; 55.5 % female; 55.5 % White) completed a 14-day diary assessing substance use. Respondents completed M = 13.8 (SD = 1.36) diaries for a compliance rate of 93.5 %. Black respondents completed significantly fewer diaries (87.9 %) than White respondents (97.9 %) although compliance rates were high among both groups. Adolescents reported high acceptability of the protocol, with 97.1 % willing to participate again. Findings suggest text-message-based EMA delivered to personal phones is acceptable and feasible for assessing substance use among adolescents. As the sociodemographic “digital divide” narrows among adolescents, this cost-effective and equitable method becomes more feasible.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Shiffman, Saul
通讯作者：
Shiffman, Saul
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Comulada, W. Scott;Lightfoot, Marguerita;Wu, Nancy
通讯作者：
Wu, Nancy
影响因子：
5
作者：
Linas BS;Genz A;Westergaard RP;Chang LW;Bollinger RC;Latkin C;Kirk GD
通讯作者：
Kirk GD
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Gil, AG;Wagner, EF;Tubman, JG
通讯作者：
Tubman, JG
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Moss, Howard Barry;Chen, Chiung M.;Yi, Hsiao-ye
通讯作者：
Yi, Hsiao-ye