Exploring the effects of knowledge of writing on reading Chinese characters in skilled readers.

Exploring the effects of knowledge of writing on reading Chinese characters in skilled readers.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/xlm0000604
复制
发表时间:
2019-04
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Fischer-Baum S
Fischer-Baum S
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhai M;Fischer-Baum S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

关于汉字书写的知识一直被认为在孩子学习阅读中文的过程中起着特别重要的作用。在本研究中,我们探讨了书写文字知识在熟练成人读者视觉文字处理中的作用。虽然有明确的神经心理学证据反对强烈的假设,即阅读依赖于中文写作,即使一旦获得了识字能力,但写作仍然可能对识字的读者如何处理视觉上呈现的汉字产生调节影响。本研究以24位中文专业读者和作家以及24位没有书面中文经验的naïve参与者为研究对象,对视觉上相似度和动作计划相似度不同的两对汉字进行了视觉相同/不同判断任务,以解决这一假设。线性混合效应模型的结果表明,相同/不同判断的速度受到视觉相似性的影响,而不受文字相似程度的影响,即使在熟练的读者群体中也是如此。这些结果表明,汉字书写知识并不影响熟练读者的视觉汉字加工。
Knowledge about how characters are written has been argued to play a particularly important role in how children learn to read Chinese. In the current study, we investigate the role that knowledge about writing characters plays in visual word processing in skilled adult readers. While there is clear neuropsychological evidence against the strong version of the hypothesis that reading depends on writing in Chinese even once literacy is acquired, it is still possible that writing could have a modulatory influence on how visually presented Chinese characters are processed in literate readers. The present study addressed this hypothesis using a visual same/different judgement task on pairs of characters that vary in how similar the two characters are visually and how similar they are in terms of motor plan, using 24 expert readers and writers of Chinese and 24 naïve participants with no prior experience with written Chinese as subjects. The results of linear mixed-effects modeling indicate that the speed of same/different judgements is influenced by visual similarity, but not by how similar they are written, even in the group of skilled readers. These results suggest that knowledge of how Chinese characters are written does not influence visual character processing in skilled readers.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2013.01558.x
发表时间: 2013-04
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Wang HC;Schotter ER;Angele B;Yang J;Simovici D;Pomplun M;Rayner K
通讯作者: Rayner K
DOI: 10.3758/bf03197222
发表时间: 1995-03-01
期刊: MEMORY & COGNITION
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
NAKA, M;NAOI, H
通讯作者: NAOI, H
DOI: 10.1155/2005/647871
发表时间: 2005-01-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Shu, H;Xiong, HZ;Bai, XL
通讯作者: Bai, XL
DOI: 10.1037/h0020279
发表时间: 1967-01-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
LIBERMAN, AM;COOPER, FS;STUDDERT.M
通讯作者: STUDDERT.M
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22017
发表时间: 2013-07-01
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Cao, Fan;Vu, Marianne;Perfetti, Charles A.
通讯作者: Perfetti, Charles A.