Disfluencies and Strategies Used by People Who Stutter During a Working Memory Task.
Disfluencies and Strategies Used by People Who Stutter During a Working Memory Task.
复制标题
在工作记忆任务中口吃的人所使用的不流畅和策略。
DOI：
10.1044/2019_jslhr-19-00393
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Arongna;Sakai;N.;Yasu;K.;and Mori;K.
工作记忆（WM）缺陷与包括口吃在内的各种交流障碍有关。阅读广度测验（阅读句子和记忆目标词的双重任务）测量工作记忆能力。这项研究表明，口吃者（PWS）和不口吃者（PWNS）在执行口吃时的策略存在差异。有效的策略和口吃样的不流利的影响，在summer.Methodthe26 PWS和24人谁不口吃进行了summer.and一个简单的阅读大声任务。之后的mesos，他们被问到的策略（“图像”或“排练”），他们使用，以记住的目标词在task.ResultsThe的比例，那些谁使用的“图像”的策略在mesos的PWS组显着较小。然而，在两组中，使用"想象"策略的人的得分都显著高于使用"排练"策略的人的得分。"排练"用户被要求进行一个"图像"策略的更多的排练，这导致了两组的分数增加。不流利的PWS组的频率显着减少，在口语阅读task. ConclusionsPWS倾向于使用不太有效的口头"排练"的策略，在口语练习。转换策略对测量的WM容量和不流利率的不同影响表明，在转换过程中增强的流利性主要归因于对言语运动控制的注意力降低。因此，使用“意象”策略，专注于交流的内容，远离言语运动控制，应该有助于PWS在日常会话中更好地交流。
PurposeWorking memory (WM) deficits are implicated in various communication disorders, including stuttering. The reading span test (RST) measures WM capacity with the dual task of reading sentences aloud and remembering target words. This study demonstrates a difference in strategy between people who stutter (PWS) and people who do not stutter (PWNS) in performing the RST. The impact of the effective strategy and the stuttering-like disfluencies during the RST were investigated.MethodTwenty-six PWS and 24 people who do not stutter performed the RST and a simple reading aloud task. After the RST, they were asked which strategy (“imagery” or “rehearsal”) they had used in order to remember the target words during the task.ResultsThe proportion of those who used an “imagery” strategy during the RST was significantly smaller in the PWS group. However, the RST scores of those who used an “imagery” strategy were significantly higher than the RST scores of those who used a “rehearsal” strategy in both groups. The “rehearsal” users were asked to undertake one more RST with an “imagery” strategy, which resulted in an increased score for both groups. The disfluency frequency of the PWS group was significantly reduced during the RST than during the oral reading task, irrespective of the employed strategy.ConclusionsPWS tended to use the less effective verbal “rehearsal” strategy during the RST. The differential effects of switching strategies on the measured WM capacity and on the disfluency rate suggest that the enhanced fluency during the RST would be mostly attributable to the reduced attention to speech motor control. Therefore, the use of the “imagery” strategy and focusing on the contents of communication, away from speech motor control, should help PWS communicate better in daily conversation.
登录
查看更多内容
评估口吃治疗效果时需要自我报告数据：言语的重复和延长。
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
V. Guntupalli;J. Kalinowski;T. Saltuklaroglu
通讯作者：
T. Saltuklaroglu
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Kristin M Pelczarski;J. Yaruss
通讯作者：
J. Yaruss
执行功能对口吃和不口吃儿童音位处理的影响。
DOI：
10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-17-0033
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
影响因子：
--
作者：
Sasisekaran,Jayanthi;Basu,Shriya
通讯作者：
Basu,Shriya
通过日语和英语阅读能力测试测量的与语言无关的工作记忆
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1992
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Osaka;N. Osaka
通讯作者：
N. Osaka
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Smith, Anne;Goffman, Lisa;Sasisekaran, Jayanthi;Weber-Fox, Christine
通讯作者：
Weber-Fox, Christine