Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace: a national representative sample in Japan.
Socioeconomic determinants of bullying in the workplace: a national representative sample in Japan.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0119435
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Kawachi I
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tsuno K;Kawakami N;Tsutsumi A;Shimazu A;Inoue A;Odagiri Y;Yoshikawa T;Haratani T;Shimomitsu T;Kawachi I
工作场所的欺凌行为越来越被认为是对员工健康的威胁。我们试图检验与工作场所欺凌的决定因素相关的三个假设：工作中的权力距离;安全氛围;与感知的社会不平等相关的挫折感。对日本20-60岁的5，000名居民进行了具有全国代表性的社区抽样问卷调查。调查问卷包括有关就业、职业、公司规模、教育、家庭收入和主观社会地位（SSS）的问题。我们询问了在过去30天内目睹和亲身经历的工作场所欺凌。在2,384名受访者中，分析了1,546名工人的数据。多元逻辑回归分析被用来研究工作场所欺负的社会决定因素。6%和15%的样本分别报告经历或目睹工作场所欺凌。在调整性别和年龄后，（比值比[OR]：2.45 [95%置信区间（CI）= 1.03-5.85]），初中毕业生（OR：2.62 [95%CI：1.01-6.79]），家庭收入最低的工人（OR：4.13 [95%CI：1.58-10.8]），SSS最低层的工人（OR：4.21 [95%CI：1.66-10.7]）经历工作场所欺凌的风险增加。当所有变量同时输入模型时，观察到较高的社会支持率与遭受欺凌之间存在显着的负相关性（p = 0.002）。同样，在目睹欺凌方面; SSS显著负相关（p = 0.017），而临时员工报告的目睹欺凌的风险显著高于正式员工（OR：2.25 [95%CI：1.04至4.87]）。SSS和经历/目睹工作场所欺凌之间的显着关联支持挫折假说。权力距离假说也得到了部分支持，临时员工在工作场所欺凌的发生率更高。
Bullying in the workplace is an increasingly recognized threat to employee health. We sought to test three hypotheses related to the determinants of workplace bullying: power distance at work; safety climate; and frustration related to perceived social inequality. A questionnaire survey was administered to a nationally representative community-based sample of 5,000 residents in Japan aged 20–60 years. The questionnaire included questions about employment, occupation, company size, education, household income, and subjective social status (SSS). We inquired about both the witnessing and personal experience of workplace bullying during the past 30 days. Among 2,384 respondents, data were analyzed from 1,546 workers. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the social determinants of workplace bullying. Six percent and 15 percent of the total sample reported experiencing or witnessing workplace bullying, respectively. After adjusting for gender and age, temporary employees (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.45 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.03–5.85]), junior high school graduates (OR: 2.62 [95%CI: 1.01–6.79]), workers with lowest household income (OR: 4.13 [95%CI:1.58–10.8]), and workers in the lowest SSS stratum (OR: 4.21 [95%CI:1.66–10.7]) were at increased risk of experiencing workplace bullying. When all variables were entered simultaneously in the model, a significant inverse association was observed between higher SSS and experiencing bullying (p = 0.002). Similarly in terms of witnessing bullying; SSS was significantly inversely associated (p = 0.017) while temporary employees reported a significantly higher risk of witnessing bullying compared to permanent workers (OR: 2.25 [95%CI:1.04 to 4.87]). The significant association between SSS and experiencing/witnessing workplace bullying supports the frustration hypothesis. The power distance hypothesis was also partly supported by the finding that temporary employees experienced a higher prevalence of workplace bullying.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1007/s00420-008-0339-8
发表时间：
2009-02-01
影响因子：
3
作者：
Ortega, Adriana;Hogh, Annie;Olsen, Ole
通讯作者：
Olsen, Ole
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Kristensen, TS;Borg, V;Hannerz, H
通讯作者：
Hannerz, H
DOI：
10.1007/s00420-012-0825-x
发表时间：
2013-11-01
影响因子：
3
作者：
Nielsen, Morten Birkeland;Tvedt, Sturle Danielsen;Matthiesen, Stig Berge
通讯作者：
Matthiesen, Stig Berge
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Agervold, M;Mikkelsen, EG
通讯作者：
Mikkelsen, EG
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Law, Rebecca;Dollard, Maureen F.;Dormann, Christian
通讯作者：
Dormann, Christian