Systematic Review: Assessment of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Over the Past Decade.
Systematic Review: Assessment of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Over the Past Decade.
复制标题
系统评价：过去10年中迟缓认知克里思速度的评估。
DOI：
10.1016/j.jaac.2020.10.016
复制
发表时间：
2021-06
影响因子：
13.3
通讯作者：
Becker SP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Becker SP
自2009年第一个使用仔细测试构建程序的SCT量表发布以来，对旨在评估缓慢认知克里思（SCT）的措施进行系统性审查。检索了MEDLINE（PubMed）、Embase、PsychINFO和Web of Science数据库，检索时间为2009年9月至2019年12月。包括报告信度（内部一致性，重测和评分员间信度），结构效度（结构效度的一个方面，侧重于项目的收敛和区分效度），同时和纵向外部效度，不变性，或干预/实验结果的文章。76项研究符合数据提取和纳入的全部标准。确定了九项用于评估SCT的措施（七项评估儿童的家长、教师和/或自我报告，两项评估成人的自我和/或间接线人报告）。每项措施都证明了可接受的出色的可靠性。所有或至少大部分的SCT项目在每个措施也有结构效度（高负荷SCT因素和低负荷ADHD注意力不集中因素）。研究支持SCT在性别和时间上的不变性，也有初步证据表明，在被调查者、ADHD和非ADHD青少年以及ADHD演示文稿之间存在不变性。儿童和青少年行为调查表（CABI），儿童集中度调查表，第二版（CCI-2）和巴克利成人ADHD评定量表-IV（BAARS-IV）分别对评估父母/教师报告，青少年自我报告和成人自我报告的SCT提供了特别强有力的支持。包括在这次审查的SCT措施共享许多积极的特性，有前途的心理支持，并已被证明是有用的检查SCT的外部相关因素在整个生命周期。虽然在过去的十年中已经取得了实质性的进展，仍然需要做的工作，以进一步提高SCT的评估和未来研究的主要方向提供。
To conduct a systematic review of the measures designed to assess sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) since the first SCT scale using careful test-construction procedures was published in 2009. The MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, PsychINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched from September 2009 through December 2019. Articles reporting on the reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability), structural validity (an aspect of construct validity focused on items’ convergent and discriminant validity), concurrent and longitudinal external validity, invariance, or intervention/experimental findings were included. Seventy-six studies met full criteria for data extraction and inclusion. Nine measures for assessing SCT were identified (seven assessing parent-, teacher-, and/or self-report in children and two assessing self- and/or collateral-informant report in adults). Each measure has demonstrated acceptable to excellent reliability. All or at least the majority of SCT items on each measure also had structural validity (high loadings on an SCT factor and low loadings on an ADHD inattention factor). Studies have supported the invariance of SCT across sex and time, and there is also initial evidence of invariance across informants, ADHD and non-ADHD youth, and ADHD presentations. The Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI), Child Concentration Inventory, Second Edition (CCI-2), and the Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale-IV (BAARS-IV) have particularly strong support for assessing parent/teacher-reported, youth self-reported, and adult self-reported SCT, respectively. The SCT measures included in this review share numerous positive properties, have promising psychometric support, and have proven useful for examining the external correlates of SCT across the life span. Although substantial progress has been made over the last decade, work remains to be done to further improve the assessment of SCT and key directions for future research are provided.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Becker SP;Burns GL;Garner AA;Jarrett MA;Luebbe AM;Epstein JN;Willcutt EG
通讯作者：
Willcutt EG
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Burns GL;Becker SP;Servera M;Bernad MD;García-Banda G
通讯作者：
García-Banda G
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Becker, Stephen P.;Garner, Annie A.;Byars, Kelly C.
通讯作者：
Byars, Kelly C.
影响因子：
11.3
作者：
Baytunca, Muharrem Burak;Inci, Sevim Berrin;Ercan, Eyup Sabri
通讯作者：
Ercan, Eyup Sabri
DOI：
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.02.013
发表时间：
2018-08
期刊：
The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine
影响因子：
--
作者：
Becker SP;Holdaway AS;Luebbe AM
通讯作者：
Luebbe AM