How does co-produced research influence adaptive capacity? Lessons from a cross-case comparison

How does co-produced research influence adaptive capacity? Lessons from a cross-case comparison
复制标题

共同开展的研究如何影响适应能力?

DOI:
10.1007/s42532-022-00121-x
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Socio-Ecological Practice Research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Getson, Jackie M.
Getson, Jackie M.
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Church, Sarah P.;Wardropper, Chloe B.;Usher, Emily;Bean, Liam F.;Gilbert, Ashlie;Eanes, Francis R.;Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D.;Babin, Nicholas;Ranjan, Pranay;Getson, Jackie M.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

共同生产知识(通过项目设计或研究)被视为解决环境问题的有效办法,这也可能提高社区面对气候变化的适应能力。然而,现实情况是,人们对联合生产对研究人员、社区和产出的长期影响知之甚少。我们定性地分析了案例研究,以了解联合生产过程和相关的适应能力成果。开发这13个案例研究是为了确定美国农业部国家粮食和农业研究所水(2001-2013年)和气候(2010-2015年)组合的影响,这些组合资助的项目侧重于与耕地上的气候和水问题有关的研究、教育和推广。案例研究数据包括访谈、调查答复以及对与单个项目有关的报告和出版物的分析。我们发现,对利益攸关方的具体需求和资产作出反应的项目与适应能力成果有很强的联系,但这些项目不一定需要高度互动的共同生产知识的做法(例如,利益攸关方驱动的研究,学术和非学术合作伙伴之间不断互动)。我们的研究提供了证据表明,在某些情况下,对利益攸关方来说时间和资源密集度较低的参与方法在建设适应能力方面可能与高度互动的联合制作努力一样有效。
Co-production of knowledge (through project design or research) is viewed as an effective approach to solving environmental problems, which may also increase community adaptive capacity in the face of climate change. However, the reality is that little is known about long-term impacts of co-production on researchers, communities, and outputs. We qualitatively analyzed case studies to understand co-production processes and related adaptive capacity outcomes. These 13 case studies were developed to identify impacts of the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture water (2001–2013) and climate (2010–2015) portfolios, which funded projects focused on research, education, and extension related to climate and water issues on working lands. Case study data included interviews, survey responses, and analysis of reports and publications related to a single project. We found that projects which were responsive to specific needs and assets of stakeholders had strong connections to adaptive capacity outcomes, but that these projects did not necessarily entail highly interactive practices of co-production of knowledge (e.g., stakeholder-driven research with continuous interactions between academic and non-academic partners). Our research provides evidence to suggest that, in some contexts, engagement approaches that are less time- and resource-intensive for stakeholders may be as effective at building adaptive capacity as highly interactive co-production efforts.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Lindsey Jones;E. Ludi;S. Levine
通讯作者: S. Levine
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
K. Jagannathan;J. Arnott;C. Wyborn;Nicole L. Klenk;K. Mach;R. Moss;K. D. Sjostrom
通讯作者: K. D. Sjostrom
DOI: 10.1002/eet.1834
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 3
作者:
Blane Harvey;Logan Cochrane;M. Epp
通讯作者: M. Epp
DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2019.1702530
发表时间: 2020-01-02
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Brix, Jacob;Krogstrup, Hanne Kathrine;Mortensen, Nanna Moeller
通讯作者: Mortensen, Nanna Moeller
DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2010.531898
发表时间: 2011-01-01
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Parris, Kevin
通讯作者: Parris, Kevin