Balancing the Environment: Computational Models as Interactive Participants in a STEM Classroom

Balancing the Environment: Computational Models as Interactive Participants in a STEM Classroom
复制标题

平衡环境:计算模型作为 STEM 课堂中的交互式参与者

DOI:
10.1007/s10956-019-09797-5
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Clark, Douglas B.
Clark, Douglas B.
中科院分区:
教育学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pierson, Ashlyn E.;Brady, Corey E.;Clark, Douglas B.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文介绍了六年级学生所做的工作,以实现和维持生产和个人有意义的调查线与计算模型。将与工具的交互框架为与共同参与者的对话交流的能力是科学学科参与和计算思维的富有成效的实践(Ehrasekharan和Nersessian 2015; Dennet 1989; Latour 1993; Pickering 1995)。我们建议,计算模型有独特的启示对话互动,因为它们是概率和迭代执行,功能,为学生提供了一个切入点,采取的立场,对待计算模型的参与者。我们的分析表明,现有的模式,在学生的社会互动的资源,灵活地与计算工具作为参与者进行互动。特别是,我们发现学生以三种方式将计算模型视为参与者:(1)作为对话的同伴,(2)作为调查路线的共同构建者,以及(3)作为学生代理和身份的投影。我们的数据还表明,学生采取灵活的,而不是固定的,对计算参与者的立场。这些立场与科学家与非人类实体的互动平行,这通常涉及将工具视为探究中的代理参与者(Latour 1999; Pickering 1995),为学生提供了一条在学科参与和计算思维交叉点进行实践的途径。
This paper describes the work done by sixth grade students to achieve and sustain productive and personally meaningful lines of inquiry with computational models. The capacity to frame interactions with tools as dialogic exchanges with co-participants is a productive practice for disciplinary engagement in science and for computational thinking (Chandrasekharan and Nersessian 2015; Dennet 1989; Latour 1993; Pickering 1995). We propose that computational models have unique affordances for dialogic interaction because they are probabilistic and iteratively executable, features that provide an entry point for students to adopt stances that treat computational models as participants. Our analysis reveals that existing patterns in students’ social interactions are resources for interacting flexibly with computational tools as participants. In particular, we found that students treated computational models as participants in three ways: (1) as conversational peers, (2) as co-constructors of lines of inquiry, and (3) as projections of students’ agency and identity. Our data also demonstrate that students take on flexible, rather than fixed, stances toward computational participants. These stances parallel scientists’ interactions with non-human entities, which often involve treating tools as agentive participants in inquiry (Latour 1999; Pickering 1995), affording students a pathway to practices at the intersection of disciplinary engagement and computational thinking.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_4
发表时间: 2018
期刊: arXiv: Physics Education
影响因子: --
作者:
P. Sengupta;A. Dickes;A. Farris
通讯作者: A. Farris
拉丁语和西班牙语的代际连续性:语言课程化的挑战
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Guadalupe Valdés
通讯作者: Guadalupe Valdés
STEM 中的发声代码:对话想象
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Paulina Haduong
通讯作者: Paulina Haduong
Frog pond:关于进化和自然选择的代码优先学习环境
DOI: 10.1145/2593968.2610491
发表时间: 2014
期刊: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children
影响因子: --
作者:
Michael S. Horn;C. Brady;A. Hjorth;Aditi Wagh;U. Wilensky
通讯作者: U. Wilensky
重新思考对应:构建模型的过程如何导致生物工程科学的发现和转移
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1463-3
发表时间: 2017
期刊: Synthese
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
S. Chandrasekharan;N. Nersessian
通讯作者: N. Nersessian