From screen time to the digital level of analysis: a scoping review of measures for digital media use in children and adolescents.

From screen time to the digital level of analysis: a scoping review of measures for digital media use in children and adolescents.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046367
复制
发表时间:
2021-05-19
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
MIST Working Group
MIST Working Group
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Browne DT;May SS;Colucci L;Hurst-Della Pietra P;Christakis D;Asamoah T;Hale L;Delrahim-Howlett K;Emond JA;Fiks AG;Madigan S;Perlman G;Rumpf HJ;Thompson D;Uzzo S;Stapleton J;Neville R;Prime H;MIST Working Group

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这一范围审查旨在通过以下方式促进年轻人数字媒体使用和福祉领域的心理测量发展:(1)确定儿童,青少年和年轻人"屏幕时间"和数字媒体使用领域的核心概念,(2)综合现有的研究范式和量化这些维度的测量工具,以及(3)突出需要指导未来措施制定的重要领域。对2014年至2019年期间发表的140个来源(126个数据库,14个灰色文献)进行了范围审查,产生了162个跨领域,用户和文化的测量工具。提取了来自奥维德MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Scopus的数据库来源,以及从儿童数字媒体使用相关的知识专家和组织获得的灰色文献。要被纳入,来源必须:(1)是一项实证调查或提出原始研究,(2)调查样本/目标人群,包括0至25岁的儿童或年轻人,(3)包括至少一种评估方法来衡量数字媒体的使用。综述、社论、信件、评论和动物模型研究均被排除。基本信息、偏倚风险水平、研究设置、范式、数据类型、数字媒体类型、设备、使用特征、应用程序或网站、样本特征、招募方法、测量工具信息、信度和效度。发现了围绕有问题的使用和识别临床损害的标准的命名的显著变化。此外,在关键领域,包括针对幼儿、整个家庭、弱势群体以及针对某些使用模式和类型的工具,也缺乏措施。这种知识综合练习强调了广泛开发和实施全面,多方法,多层次和多信息测量套件的必要性。
This scoping review aims to facilitate psychometric developments in the field of digital media usage and well-being in young people by (1) identifying core concepts in the area of “screen time” and digital media use in children, adolescents, and young adults, (2) synthesising existing research paradigms and measurement tools that quantify these dimensions, and (3) highlighting important areas of need to guide future measure development. A scoping review of 140 sources (126 database, 14 grey literature) published between 2014 and 2019 yielded 162 measurement tools across a range of domains, users, and cultures. Database sources from Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus were extracted, in addition to grey literature obtained from knowledge experts and organisations relevant to digital media use in children. To be included, the source had to: (1) be an empirical investigation or present original research, (2) investigate a sample/target population that included children or young persons between the ages of 0 and 25 years of age, and (3) include at least one assessment method for measuring digital media use. Reviews, editorials, letters, comments and animal model studies were all excluded. Basic information, level of risk of bias, study setting, paradigm, data type, digital media type, device, usage characteristics, applications or websites, sample characteristics, recruitment methods, measurement tool information, reliability and validity. Significant variability in nomenclature surrounding problematic use and criteria for identifying clinical impairment was discovered. Moreover, there was a paucity of measures in key domains, including tools for young children, whole families, disadvantaged groups, and for certain patterns and types of usage. This knowledge synthesis exercise highlights the need for the widespread development and implementation of comprehensive, multi-method, multilevel, and multi-informant measurement suites.
DOI: 10.1159/000355076
发表时间: 2014-01-01
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Guertler, Diana;Rumpf, Hans-Juergen;Meyer, Christian
通讯作者: Meyer, Christian
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139004
发表时间: 2015
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Andrews S;Ellis DA;Shaw H;Piwek L
通讯作者: Piwek L
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-2593
发表时间: 2016-11-01
期刊: PEDIATRICS
影响因子: 8
作者:
Chassiakos, Yolanda (Linda) Reid;Radesky, Jenny;Cross, Corinn
通讯作者: Cross, Corinn
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
发表时间: 2011-03-01
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Armstrong, Rebecca;Hall, Belinda J.;Waters, Elizabeth
通讯作者: Waters, Elizabeth
DOI: 10.1177/0963721419838245
发表时间: 2019-08-01
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
Barr, Rachel
通讯作者: Barr, Rachel