Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure.
Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089
复制
发表时间：
2018-03
期刊：
影响因子：
9.8
通讯作者：
Goodman SN
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Moher D;Naudet F;Cristea IA;Miedema F;Ioannidis JPA;Goodman SN
对研究人员的评估对于决定聘用、晋升和任期是必要的。越来越多的科学领导者认为，目前的教师激励和奖励制度与社会需求不一致，与科学出版记录的可重复性危机和次优质量的原因有关的证据脱节。为了解决这一问题，特别是临床和生命科学领域的问题，我们于2017年1月在华盛顿召开了一个由22名成员组成的专家小组研讨会。22位学术带头人、资助者和科学家参加了会议。作为会议的背景，我们完成了对22份批评现行激励制度的关键文件的选择性文献综述。从每一份文件中，我们提取了作者如何看待评估科学和科学家的问题，维持现状评估科学家的意外后果，以及他们提出的解决方案的细节。由此产生的表格被用作参与者讨论的种子。这导致了评估科学家和相关研究和政策影响的六项原则。我们希望本文的内容将成为建立最佳做法和重新设计参与这一进程的许多参与者评估科学家的现行方法的基础。
Assessment of researchers is necessary for decisions of hiring, promotion, and tenure. A burgeoning number of scientific leaders believe the current system of faculty incentives and rewards is misaligned with the needs of society and disconnected from the evidence about the causes of the reproducibility crisis and suboptimal quality of the scientific publication record. To address this issue, particularly for the clinical and life sciences, we convened a 22-member expert panel workshop in Washington, DC, in January 2017. Twenty-two academic leaders, funders, and scientists participated in the meeting. As background for the meeting, we completed a selective literature review of 22 key documents critiquing the current incentive system. From each document, we extracted how the authors perceived the problems of assessing science and scientists, the unintended consequences of maintaining the status quo for assessing scientists, and details of their proposed solutions. The resulting table was used as a seed for participant discussion. This resulted in six principles for assessing scientists and associated research and policy implications. We hope the content of this paper will serve as a basis for establishing best practices and redesigning the current approaches to assessing scientists by the many players involved in that process.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Hammarfelt, Bjorn
通讯作者：
Hammarfelt, Bjorn
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Brembs B;Button K;Munafò M
通讯作者：
Munafò M
影响因子：
3
作者：
Heckathorn DD
通讯作者：
Heckathorn DD
影响因子：
168.9
作者：
Glasziou, Paul;Altman, Douglas G.;Wager, Elizabeth
通讯作者：
Wager, Elizabeth
DOI：
10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62296-5
发表时间：
2014-01-18
期刊：
Lancet (London, England)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Chan AW;Song F;Vickers A;Jefferson T;Dickersin K;Gøtzsche PC;Krumholz HM;Ghersi D;van der Worp HB
通讯作者：
van der Worp HB