The COVID-19 response illustrates that traditional academic reward structures and metrics do not reflect crucial contributions to modern science.
The COVID-19 response illustrates that traditional academic reward structures and metrics do not reflect crucial contributions to modern science.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000913
复制
发表时间：
2020-10
期刊：
影响因子：
9.8
通讯作者：
Eggo RM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kucharski AJ;Funk S;Eggo RM
COVID-19 大流行激发了许多具有现实世界影响的开放和协作分析研究项目。然而，尽管这些活动很有价值，但传统的学术衡量标准却普遍忽视了这些活动。科学最终是通过分析工作来改进的，无论是确保论文中的可重复且记录良好的代码、开发和维护灵活的工具、共享和整理数据，还是向更广泛的受众传播分析。为了提高现代科学的影响力和可持续性，确保这些分析活动以及从事这些活动的人员在学术界受到重视至关重要。
The COVID-19 pandemic has motivated many open and collaborative analytical research projects with real-world impact. However, despite their value, such activities are generally overlooked by traditional academic metrics. Science is ultimately improved by analytical work, whether ensuring reproducible and well-documented code to accompany papers, developing and maintaining flexible tools, sharing and curating data, or disseminating analysis to wider audiences. To increase the impact and sustainability of modern science, it will be crucial to ensure these analytical activities—and the people who do them—are valued in academia.
影响因子：
9.8
作者：
Moher, David;Bouter, Lex;Dirnagl, Ulrich
通讯作者：
Dirnagl, Ulrich