Answering the ultimate question "what is the proximal cause of aging?".

Answering the ultimate question "what is the proximal cause of aging?".
复制标题

DOI:
10.18632/aging.100525
复制
发表时间:
2012-12
期刊:
Aging
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Blagosklonny MV
Blagosklonny MV
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Blagosklonny MV

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最近的发现表明,衰老既不是由任何原因的分子损伤积累驱动的,也不是由任何类型的随机损伤驱动的。一种名为准程序化功能亢进的新理论的一些预测已经得到证实,一种临床上可用的药物可以延缓动物的衰老和疾病。疾病和衰老之间的关系变得很明显。然而,事实证明,衰老的本质是如此令人震惊,以至于这一理论不能立即被接受,并提出了任何可能的论点来处理它。我认为这些论点实际上支持了一种新的理论。还有什么问题吗?分子损伤的积累是否仍会在衰老过程中发挥特殊的作用?
Recent discoveries suggest that aging is neither driven by accumulation of molecular damage of any cause, nor by random damage of any kind. Some predictions of a new theory, quasi-programmed hyperfunction, have already been confirmed and a clinically-available drug slows aging and delays diseases in animals. The relationship between diseases and aging becomes easily apparent. Yet, the essence of aging turns out to be so startling that the theory cannot be instantly accepted and any possible arguments are raised for its disposal. I discuss that these arguments actually support a new theory. Are any questions remaining? And might accumulation of molecular damage still play a peculiar role in aging?
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100281
发表时间: 2011-02
期刊: Aging
影响因子: --
作者:
Blagosklonny MV
通讯作者: Blagosklonny MV
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001159
发表时间: 2010-10-14
期刊: PLoS genetics
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Biteau B;Karpac J;Supoyo S;Degennaro M;Lehmann R;Jasper H
通讯作者: Jasper H
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2010.11.003
发表时间: 2011-05
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Biteau, Benoit;Karpac, Jason;Hwangbo, DaeSung;Jasper, Heinrich
通讯作者: Jasper, Heinrich
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100443
发表时间: 2012-03
期刊: Aging
影响因子: --
作者:
Blagosklonny MV
通讯作者: Blagosklonny MV
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100273
发表时间: 2011-02
期刊: Aging
影响因子: --
作者:
Anisimov VN;Berstein LM;Popovich IG;Zabezhinski MA;Egormin PA;Piskunova TS;Semenchenko AV;Tyndyk ML;Yurova MN;Kovalenko IG;Poroshina TE
通讯作者: Poroshina TE