On the origin of islands

On the origin of islands
复制标题

论岛屿的起源

DOI:
10.1080/01690965.2013.788196
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
P. Sturt
P. Sturt
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Masaya Yoshida;N. Kazanina;Leticia Pablos;P. Sturt

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在心理语言学文献中,对wh-dependencies的岛屿限制有相当大的争议。一个主要的争论点是岛屿是否来自加工限制,如工作记忆容量或特定领域的语言知识。目前的研究调查是否可以减少岛屿处理的考虑,通过检查处理的另一个长距离的依赖,下指。如果许可成分(动词或介词)落在一个岛内的wh依赖关系会给解析器带来无法承受的内存负荷,那么其他依赖关系,包括前指,如果许可成分(先行词)落在一个岛内,应该会产生类似的处理困难。自定进度的阅读实验结果表明,网络条件下下的后指依赖的形成不受孤岛限制的影响。我们的结论是,岛屿不能完全还原到处理的考虑,因此必须-至少部分-是语法的起源。
There is considerable controversy on island constraints on wh-dependencies in the psycholinguistic literature. One major point of contention is whether islands result from processing limitations such as working memory capacity or from domain-specific linguistic knowledge. The current study investigates whether islands can be reduced to processing considerations, by examining processing of another long-distance dependency, cataphora. If wh-dependencies with the licensing element (the verb or preposition) falling inside an island entail an unbearable memory load on the parser, then other dependencies, including cataphora, with a licensing element (the antecedent), falling inside an island, should yield a similar processing difficulty. The results from a self-paced reading experiment demonstrate that online formation of a cataphoric dependency is not affected by island constraints. We conclude that islands are not fully reducible to processing considerations and therefore must – at least in part – be of grammatical origin.
DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.111.2.228
发表时间: 1982
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. General
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Just;P. Carpenter;J. Woolley
通讯作者: M. Just;P. Carpenter;J. Woolley