A cognitive-based indicator of deviant sexual interest: Concurrent validation of the Stroop task
A cognitive-based indicator of deviant sexual interest: Concurrent validation of the Stroop task
复制标题
基于认知的异常性兴趣指标：Stroop 任务的并行验证
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Jeglic
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ashley H. Spada;E. Jeglic
摘要性行为异常是性累犯最强的预测因子之一。K.，& Bussière，M. T.（1998年）。预测复发：性犯罪者累犯研究的荟萃分析。咨询和临床心理学杂志，66，348-362。doi：10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348]。最常用的评估性行为异常的方法是阴茎测量法，它引起了方法和伦理上的批评，而自我报告容易受到社会期望和缺乏洞察力的影响。为了克服这些局限性，研究人员利用认知措施，包括修改Stroop任务，以衡量性犯罪者之间的越轨性兴趣，使用受害者选择作为比较措施。然而，结果并不确定。本研究探讨了修改后的Stroop任务的有效性，作为衡量偏差的性兴趣之间的非犯罪样本的570名女性和223名男性参与者，使用自我报告作为比较措施。结果表明，一个显着的性别差异，同时有效性，有一个显着的关系，自我报告的偏差和偏差字Stroop性能的男性，但不为女性受访者，这表明Stroop是一个可行的选择，评估男性之间的性偏差。这些研究结果的影响进行了讨论相对性累犯风险评估。
ABSTRACT One of the strongest predictors of sexual recidivism is sexual deviance [Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348]. Phallometric testing, the most commonly used method of assessing sexual deviance, has elicited methodological and ethical criticisms, while self-report is vulnerable to social desirability and poor insight. To overcome these limitations, researchers have utilised cognitive measures, including a modified Stroop task, to measure deviant sexual interests among sex offenders using victim selection as a comparison measure. However, the results have been inconclusive. The current study explored the validity of the modified Stroop task as a measure of deviant sexual interest among a non-offending sample of 570 females and 223 male participants, using self-report as the comparison measure. The results indicated a significant gender difference in concurrent validity; there was a significant relationship between self-reported deviance and deviant word Stroop performance for male but not for female respondents, suggesting the Stroop is a viable option for assessing sexual deviance among males. Implications of these findings are discussed relative to sexual recidivism risk assessment.
处理强奸受害者的威胁相关信息。
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Foa,EB;Feske,U;Murdock,TB;Kozak,MJ;McCarthy,PR
通讯作者：
McCarthy,PR
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Cha, Christine B.;Najmi, Sadia;Park, Jennifer M.;Finn, Christine T.;Nock, Matthew K.
通讯作者：
Nock, Matthew K.