Test-Retest Reliabilities of Four Tactic-first Sexual Violence History Questionnaires.
Test-Retest Reliabilities of Four Tactic-first Sexual Violence History Questionnaires.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/vio0000384
复制
发表时间：
2021-11
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Delahanty DL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anderson RE;Garcia M;Delahanty DL
本研究记录、比较和对比了策略优先性经历调查（T-SES）和拒绝后性持续量表（PRSPS）的受害和犯罪形式的重测可靠性。 243 名 Mechanical Turk 工人（116 名女性，124 名男性）在时间 1 和大约一周后的时间 2 通过匿名网络调查以随机顺序完成了四份问卷。重测估计值存在一致的性别差异。在评估女性受害史时，T-SES 和 PRSPS 均显示出最低至良好可靠性的证据（κ > .61，ICC = .86–92），而对于男性而言，PRSPS (κ = .64) 比 T-SES (κ = .59) 更加一致。在评估犯罪史时，性别差异较少，尽管事后分析表明评估物质使用促进犯罪的潜在性别差异（κ .48–.83），但仅限于少数案例。连续评分方法是最可靠的，二分评分最可靠，而分类评分通常不符合最低可接受标准。对于强奸受害确认项目，我们发现女性可靠性的有力证据（κ = 0.89，n = 31）和男性可靠性的暗示性证据（n = 7）。标准版和扩展版问卷的可靠性几乎没有差异。当连续评分时，所有四份问卷都表现出一周重测可靠性的良好证据。可靠性的证据在人群和研究最充分的结构中最为有力——女性的受害历史和男性的犯罪历史。
The present study documented, compared, and contrasted the test-retest reliabilities of the victimization and perpetration forms of a Tactic-first Sexual Experiences Survey (T-SESs) and the Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scales (PRSPSs). 243 Mechanical Turk workers (116 women, 124 men) completed four questionnaires in a randomized order via anonymous web survey at Time 1 and approximately one week later at Time 2. There were consistent gender differences in test-retest estimates. When assessing a history of victimization in women, both the T-SES and the PRSPS demonstrated evidence of minimal to good reliability (κ > .61, ICC = .86–92) while for men the PRSPS (κ = .64) was more consistent than the T-SES (κ = .59). When assessing a history of perpetration, there were fewer gender differences although post-hoc analyses suggest potential gender differences in assessing substance use facilitated perpetration (κ .48–.83) but were limited by few cases. Continuous scoring approaches were the most reliable, dichotomous scores were mostly reliable, and categorical scores generally did not meet minimal acceptable standards. For the rape victimization acknowledgment items, we found strong evidence of reliability for women (κ = .89, n = 31) and suggestive evidence of reliability for men (n = 7). There were few differences in reliability between standard and extended versions of the questionnaires. All four questionnaires exhibited good evidence of one-week test-retest reliability when scored continuously. Evidence of reliability was strongest with the populations and constructs most well studied – victimization history among women and perpetration history among men.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Davis, Kelly Cue;Gilmore, Amanda K.;Norris, Jeanette
通讯作者：
Norris, Jeanette
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Daigle, Leah E.;Fisher, Bonnie S.;Cullen, Francis T.
通讯作者：
Cullen, Francis T.
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Anthony, Elizabeth R.;Cook, Sarah L.
通讯作者：
Cook, Sarah L.
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Abbey, A;Parkhill, MR;Zawacki, T
通讯作者：
Zawacki, T
DOI：
10.1108/jacpr-05-2017-0292
发表时间：
2017-01-01
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
Bouffard, Leana;Goodson, Amanda
通讯作者：
Goodson, Amanda