Reducing the Discrepancy Between ASTER and MODIS Land Surface Temperature Products.

Reducing the Discrepancy Between ASTER and MODIS Land Surface Temperature Products.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/s7123043
复制
发表时间:
2007-12-04
期刊:
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ke C
Ke C
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu Y;Yamaguchi Y;Ke C

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

人为引起的全球变暖显著增加了卫星监测全球地表温度的重要性。中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)提供几乎每天覆盖地球的1公里分辨率LST产品,对本地和全球变化研究都是非常宝贵的。先进星载热发射反射辐射计(ASTER)提供了与MODIS在相同高度和最低点同时获得的90米高空间分辨率和16天循环周期的LST产品。ASTER和MODIS在分辨率上是互补的,为尺度相关的研究提供了独特的机会。ASTER和MODIS的地表温度被广泛使用,但地表温度的误差大多被忽视。校正ASTER-to-MODIS LST差异对于依赖于这些传感器联合使用的研究至关重要。在本研究中,我们比较了三种校正方法:Wan等人的方法、改进的Wan等人的方法和基于广义分割窗口(GSW)算法的方法。Wan等人的方法使用MODIS 5公里地表温度校正MODIS 1公里地表温度。通过结合ASTER发射率和MODIS 5公里数据,改进了Wan等人的方法。GSW算法方法不使用MODIS 5 km数据,只使用ASTER发射率数据。我们研究了中国黄土高原部分半干旱地区的情况。所有方法都有效地减小了aster - modis的LST差异。经过地形校正后,Wan等方法的ASTER-to-MODIS LST差值从2.7±1.28 K降至-0.1±1.87 K,改进方法降至0.2±1.57 K,基于GSW算法的方法降至0.1±1.33 K。在所有方法中,基于GSW算法的方法在均值、标准差、均方根和相关系数方面表现最好。
Human-induced global warming has significantly increased the importance of satellite monitoring of land surface temperature (LST) on a global scale. The MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) provides a 1-km resolution LST product with almost daily coverage of the Earth, invaluable to both local and global change studies. The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) provides a LST product with a high spatial resolution of 90-m and a 16-day recurrent cycle, simultaneously acquired at the same height and nadir view as MODIS. ASTER and MODIS are complementary in resolution, offering a unique opportunity for scale-related studies. ASTER and MODIS LST have been widely used but the errors in LST were mostly disregarded. Correction of ASTER-to-MODIS LST discrepancies is essential for studies reliant upon the joint use of these sensors. In this study, we compared three correction approaches: the Wan et al.'s approach, the refined Wan et al.'s approach, and the generalized split window (GSW) algorithm based approach. The Wan et al.'s approach corrects the MODIS 1-km LST using MODIS 5-km LST. The refined approach modifies the Wan et al.'s approach through incorporating ASTER emissivity and MODIS 5-km data. The GSW algorithm approach does not use MODIS 5-km but only ASTER emissivity data. We examined the case over a semi-arid terrain area for the part of the Loess Plateau of China. All the approaches reduced the ASTER-to-MODIS LST discrepancy effectively. With terrain correction, the original ASTER-to-MODIS LST difference reduced from 2.7±1.28 K to -0.1±1.87 K for the Wan et al.'s approach, 0.2±1.57 K for the refined approach, and 0.1±1.33 K for the GSW algorithm based approach. Among all the approaches, the GSW algorithm based approach performed best in terms of mean, standard deviation, root mean square root, and correlation coefficient.
DOI: 10.1080/014311600210100
发表时间: 2000-04-15
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Muchoney, D;Borak, J;Strahler, A
通讯作者: Strahler, A
DOI: 10.1109/36.508406
发表时间: 1996-07-01
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Wan, ZM;Dozier, J
通讯作者: Dozier, J
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00085-8
发表时间: 2002-11-01
影响因子: 13.5
作者:
Wolfe, RE;Nishihama, M;Patt, FS
通讯作者: Patt, FS
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02259-z
发表时间: 1995-12-01
影响因子: 6.2
作者:
NORMAN, JM;BECKER, F
通讯作者: BECKER, F
DOI: 10.1109/36.700993
发表时间: 1998-07-01
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Barnes, WL;Pagano, TS;Salomonson, VV
通讯作者: Salomonson, VV