Metal-organic frameworks and self-assembled supramolecular coordination complexes: comparing and contrasting the design, synthesis, and functionality of metal-organic materials.
Metal-organic frameworks and self-assembled supramolecular coordination complexes: comparing and contrasting the design, synthesis, and functionality of metal-organic materials.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/cr3002824
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-09
期刊:
影响因子:
62.1
通讯作者:
Stang, Peter J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cook, Timothy R.;Zheng, Yao-Rong;Stang, Peter J.
In 1893, Alfred Werner described the structure of octahedral transition metal complexes and provided the basis for assigning coordination number and oxidation state to what were then known as double salts. 1 This term arose from the observation that transition metal ions appeared to form bonds not only to anionic ligands with which to neutralize their charge, but also to additional species, which seemed unnecessary since neutrality was already achieved. This work was the origin of modern coordination chemistry and greatly expanded the field of inorganic chemistry. By understanding the preferred coordination geometry about a metal ion, rational synthetic methodologies to install specific ligands was now possible. The past 119 years have witnessed a tremendous growth in coordination chemistry, leading to advances in our understanding of the synthesis, structure, and reactivity of novel complexes and materials from simple metal− ligand complexes to organometallic catalysts and extended inorganic polymers. In recent decades, two new branches of coordination chemistry have emerged, metal− organic frameworks (MOFs) and supramolecular coordination complexes (SCCs). The former are comprised of infinite networks of metal centers or inorganic clusters bridged by simple organic linkers through metal− ligand coordination bonds. The latter encompass discrete systems in which carefully selected metal centers undergo self-assembly with ligands containing multiple binding sites oriented with specific angularity to generate a finite supramolecular complex. On the most basic level, both SCCs and MOFs share the design of metal nodes linked by organic ligands and such constructs can be broadly defined as metal− organic materials (MOMs). 1.1. Supramolecular Coordination-Driven Self-AssemblySupramolecular polygons and polyhedra based on metal− ligand coordination emerged in part as a result of studies in the 1960s by Pedersen and co-workers, which demonstrated that complementary small molecules could exhibit intermolecular recognition via noncovalent interactions. 2 Early molecularrecognition systems were simple: crown ethers could be synthesized and selectively accommodate simple guest ions. New host/guest systems quickly followed, leading to more complex ensembles such as cryptand and spherand hosts with small molecule guests, pioneered by Lehn 3 and Cram. 4 The noncovalent interactions governing host/guest formation were then applied to construct large entities from molecular components. These constructs, held together by intramolecular hydrogen bonding, π− π interactions, van der Waals forces, and
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Bar, Arun Kumar;Chakrabarty, Rajesh;Mukherjee, Partha Sarathi
通讯作者:
Mukherjee, Partha Sarathi
影响因子:
15
作者:
Allendorf, Mark D.;Houk, Ronald J. T.;Hesketh, Peter J.
通讯作者:
Hesketh, Peter J.
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Alessio, Enzo;Casanova, Massimo;Iengo, Elisabetta
通讯作者:
Iengo, Elisabetta
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Barry, Nicolas P. E.;Therrien, Bruno
通讯作者:
Therrien, Bruno
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Bar, Arun Kumar;Mostafa, Golam;Mukherjee, Partha Sarathi
通讯作者:
Mukherjee, Partha Sarathi