Point-and-Shoot Memories

Point-and-Shoot Memories
复制标题

傻瓜相机的回忆

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Psychology Science
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L. Henkel
L. Henkel
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. Henkel

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

两项研究考察了拍摄物体是否会影响人们对它们的记忆。参与者被带着导游参观了一家艺术博物馆,并被指示观察一些物品并拍摄其他物品。结果显示了拍照障碍效应:与只观察物品而不拍照相比,如果参与者将每个物品作为一个整体拍照,他们记住的物品和物品的细节以及物品在博物馆中的位置都更少。然而,当参与者放大拍摄物体的特定部分时,他们随后的识别和细节记忆并没有受到损害,事实上,对没有放大的特征的记忆与对放大的特征的记忆一样强。这一发现突出了人们的记忆和相机的“记忆”之间的关键差异,并表明这种专注的活动所涉及的额外的注意力和认知过程可以消除拍照障碍的影响。
Two studies examined whether photographing objects impacts what is remembered about them. Participants were led on a guided tour of an art museum and were directed to observe some objects and to photograph others. Results showed a photo-taking-impairment effect: If participants took a photo of each object as a whole, they remembered fewer objects and remembered fewer details about the objects and the objects’ locations in the museum than if they instead only observed the objects and did not photograph them. However, when participants zoomed in to photograph a specific part of the object, their subsequent recognition and detail memory was not impaired, and, in fact, memory for features that were not zoomed in on was just as strong as memory for features that were zoomed in on. This finding highlights key differences between people’s memory and the camera’s “memory” and suggests that the additional attentional and cognitive processes engaged by this focused activity can eliminate the photo-taking-impairment effect.
老年人和年轻人的事后回顾:提高复杂日常事件的记忆能力。
DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.2.277
发表时间: 1998
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Koutstaal,W;Schacter,DL;Johnson,MK;Angell,KE;Gross,MS
通讯作者: Gross,MS
照片引起的错误回忆:老年人和年轻人的比较。
DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.12.2.203
发表时间: 1997
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Schacter,DL;Koutstaal,W;Johnson,MK;Gross,MS;Angell,KE
通讯作者: Angell,KE