The National Environmental Policy Act and the USDA Forest Service: Where We Agree, Where We Disagree, and Why
The National Environmental Policy Act and the USDA Forest Service: Where We Agree, Where We Disagree, and Why
复制标题
《国家环境政策法》和美国农业部林务局：我们同意的地方、我们不同意的地方以及原因
DOI：
10.1093/jofore/fvab076
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Scott, Tyler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fleischman, Forrest;Struthers, Cory;Arnold, Gwen;Dockry, Michael J.;Scott, Tyler
在本文中，我们回应了对我们早期检查美国农业部林务局 (USFS) 规划流程的工作的批评。我们感谢我们的批评者在 USFS 规划的讨论中引入新数据。进一步的数据整合是加深对机构活动的了解的一条有前途的途径。我们的批评者的分析在很大程度上支持了我们最初的主张。我们最重要的区别在于我们对规划过程与机构目标关系的概念化。尽管我们的批评者认为美国农业部法律规定的规划流程是土地管理活动的障碍，但我们认为公众评议期、科学分析和土地管理活动是该机构用来实现其公共利益管理土地目标的工具。研究意义：美国农业部林业局当前的规划流程被批评为完成土地管理活动的障碍，但它也是确保科学管理和理解该机构在法律上必须遵守的公共价值观和利益的重要工具。坚持。
In this article, we respond to a critique of our earlier work examining the USDA Forest Service’s (USFS’s) planning processes. We appreciate that our critics introduce new data to the discussion of USFS planning. Further data integration is a promising path to developing a deeper understanding of agency activities. Our critics’ analysis largely supports our original claims. Our most important difference is in our conceptualization of the planning process’s relationship to agency goals. Although our critics conceive of the USFS’s legally prescribed planning processes as a barrier to land management activities, we believe that public comment periods, scientific analysis, and land management activities are tools the agency uses to achieve its goals of managing land in the public interest.Study Implications: The USDA Forest Service’s current planning process has been critiqued as a barrier to accomplishing land management activities, but it is also an important tool for insuring science-based management and understanding public values and interests that the agency is legally bound to uphold.
美国林务局实施《国家环境政策法案》：快速、多变、很少提起诉讼且数量下降
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Fleischman, Forrest;Struthers, Cory;Arnold, Gwen;Dockry, Mike;Scott, Tyler
通讯作者：
Scott, Tyler
对《林业杂志》文章的回应：“美国林务局实施国家环境政策法案：快速、多变、很少提起诉讼且数量下降”
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Todd A Morgan;M. J. Niccolucci;Erik C Berg
通讯作者：
Erik C Berg