PD-L1 expression in lung cancer and its correlation with driver mutations: a meta-analysis.

PD-L1 expression in lung cancer and its correlation with driver mutations: a meta-analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/s41598-017-10925-7
复制
发表时间:
2017-08-31
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Wang Y
Wang Y
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang M;Li G;Wang Y;Wang Y;Zhao S;Haihong P;Zhao H;Wang Y

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

尽管许多研究已经解决了程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达在肺癌中的预后价值,但结果仍存在争议。对PubMed、EMBASE和科克伦图书馆数据库进行了系统检索,以确定PD-L 1表达和驱动突变与总生存期(OS)之间的相关性。本次荟萃分析共纳入47项研究的11,444例患者,汇总结果显示PD-L1表达增加与预后不良相关(HR = 1.40,95%CI:1.19-1.65,P < 0.001)。在根据组织学类型分层的亚组分析中,汇总结果表明,PD-L1表达增加是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的不利预后因素(HR = 1.26,95% CI:1.05-1.52,P = 0.01)和肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌(LELC)(HR = 3.04,95%CI:1.19-7.77,P = 0.02),而非小细胞肺癌(HR = 0.62,95%CI:0.27-1.39,P = 0.24)。合并OR表明PD-L1表达与性别、吸烟状况、组织学、分化程度、肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移、TNM分期和EGFR突变相关。然而,PD-L1表达与ALK重排和KRAS突变无关。
Although many studies have addressed the prognostic value of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in lung cancer, the results remain controversial. A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify the correlation between PD-L1 expression and driver mutations and overall survival (OS). This meta-analysis enrolled a total of 11,444 patients for 47 studies, and the pooled results showed that increased PD-L1 expression was associated with poor prognosis (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19–1.65, P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis stratified according to histology types, the pooled results demonstrated that increased PD-L1 expression was an unfavorable prognostic factor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05–1.52, P = 0.01) and pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) (HR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.19–7.77, P = 0.02), rather than small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.27–1.39, P = 0.24). The pooled ORs indicated that PD-L1 expression was associated with gender, smoking status, histology, differentiation, tumour size, lymph nodal metastasis, TNM stage and EGFR mutation. However, PD-L1 expression was not correlated with ALK rearrangement and KRAS mutations.
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5028
发表时间: 2015-10-20
期刊: Oncotarget
影响因子: --
作者:
Fang W;Hong S;Chen N;He X;Zhan J;Qin T;Zhou T;Hu Z;Ma Y;Zhao Y;Tian Y;Yang Y;Xue C;Tang Y;Huang Y;Zhao H;Zhang L
通讯作者: Zhang L
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12399
发表时间: 2017-03
期刊: Thoracic cancer
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Guo Q;Sun Y;Yu S;Bai H;Zhao J;Zhuo M;Wang J
通讯作者: Wang J
DOI: 10.1700/1217.13499
发表时间: 2012-11-01
期刊: TUMORI
影响因子: --
作者:
Chen, Yan-bin;Mu, Chuan-Yong;Huang, Jian-An
通讯作者: Huang, Jian-An
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv574
发表时间: 2016-02-01
期刊: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
影响因子: 50.5
作者:
Cierna, Z.;Mego, M.;Babal, P.
通讯作者: Babal, P.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153954
发表时间: 2016
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Ameratunga M;Asadi K;Lin X;Walkiewicz M;Murone C;Knight S;Mitchell P;Boutros P;John T
通讯作者: John T