Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice

Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice
复制标题

检查分布式检索实践计划的效率

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Katherine A. Rawson
Katherine A. Rawson
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Pyc;Katherine A. Rawson

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

鉴于学生通常有大量的课程材料学习,但学习时间有限,评估学习时间表的效率是很重要的。我们探讨了分布式检索加再学习的各种时间表的效率。在两个实验中,227名大学生被要求学习斯瓦希里语-英语词汇。与传统的时间表组不同,所有项目在初始研究后进行3次实践试验(与大多数以前的研究一样)。在退出时间表组中,分配给每个项目的练习试验次数各不相同,在达到标准性能后,对给定项目的练习停止。辍学时间表导致的性能水平类似于传统的时间表(但在更少的试验),它是特别有效的学习最初不正确的项目。然而,各种时间表的效率主要取决于项目介绍的间隔时间。结果表明,辍学可以是一个更有效的学习时间表的学生比传统的时间表的做法。
Given that students typically have a sizeable amount of course material to learn but a finite amount of study time, evaluating the efficiency of study schedules is important. We explored the efficiency of various schedules of distributed retrieval plus restudy. Across two experiments, 227 undergraduates were asked to learn Swahili—English vocabulary word pairs. Inconventional schedule groups, all items were presented for 3 practice trials after initial study (as in most previous research). Indropout schedule groups, the number of practice trials allocated to each item varied, in that practice with a given item was discontinued after criterion performance had been reached. A dropout schedule led to levels of performance similar to those for conventional schedules (but in fewer trials), and it was particularly effective for learning initially incorrect items. However, the efficiency of the various schedules depended critically on the interval between presentations of an item. Results suggest that dropout can be a more efficient learning schedule for students than can conventional schedules of practice.
DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.2.279
发表时间: 1986
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
Nelson,TO;Leonesio,RJ;Landwehr,RS;Narens,L
通讯作者: Narens,L