Evaluation of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics and Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults.
Evaluation of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics and Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29063
复制
发表时间:
2020-12-01
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Sudore RL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nouri S;Lyles CR;Rubinsky AD;Patel K;Desai R;Fields J;DeRouen MC;Volow A;Bibbins-Domingo K;Sudore RL
Do rates of advance care planning vary by neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES)? In this cross-sectional study of 13 104 older adults in the San Francisco Bay Area, those living in neighborhoods with lower nSES had lower odds of advanced care planning compared with those in neighborhoods with high nSES, with those in the lowest quintile having 29% lower odds. Mapping geocoded data allowed identification of 5 San Francisco neighborhoods with both low nSES and advance care planning. These findings may help to inform the development of multilevel interventions, including targeted, community-based program delivery to areas with the highest need and greatest disadvantage. This cross-sectional study examines data from University of California San Francisco Health patients aged 65 years and older and whether there is an association between neighborhood socioeconomic status and rates of advance care planning. Advance care planning (ACP) is low among older adults with socioeconomic disadvantage. There is a need for tailored community-based approaches to increase ACP, but community patterns of ACP are poorly understood. To examine the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and ACP and to identify communities with both low nSES and low rates of ACP. This cross-sectional study examined University of California San Francisco electronic health record (EHR) data and place-based data from 9 San Francisco Bay Area counties. Participants were primary care patients aged 65 years or older and living in the San Francisco Bay Area in July 2017. Statistical analysis was performed from May to June 2020. Patients’ home addresses were geocoded and assigned to US Census tracts. The primary factor, nSES, an index combining area-level measures of income, education, poverty, employment, occupation, and housing or rent values, was divided into quintiles scaled to the distribution of all US Census tracts in the Bay Area (Q1 = lowest nSES). Covariates were from the EHR and included health care use (primary care, outpatient specialty, emergency department, and inpatient encounters in the prior year). ACP was defined as a scanned document (eg, advance directive), ACP Current Procedural Terminology code, or ACP note type in the EHR. There were 13 104 patients included in the cohort—mean (SD) age was 75 (8) years, with 7622 female patients (58.2%), 897 patients (6.8%) identified as Black, 913 (7.0%) as Latinx, 3788 (28.9%) as Asian/Pacific Islander, and 748 (5.7%) as other minority race/ethnicity, and 2393 (18.3%) self-reported that they preferred to speak a non-English language. Of these, 3827 patients (29.2%) had documented ACP. The cohort was distributed across all 5 quintiles of nSES (Q1: 1426 patients [10.9%]; Q2: 1792 patients [13.7%]; Q3: 2408 patients [18.4%]; Q4: 3330 patients [25.4%]; Q5: 4148 patients [31.7%]). Compared with Q5 and after adjusting for health care use, all lower nSES quintiles showed a lower odds of ACP in a graded fashion (Q1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.61-0.84], Q2: aOR = 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.86], Q3: aOR = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.71-0.93], Q4: aOR = 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72-0.93]. A bivariable map of ACP by nSES allowed identification of 5 neighborhoods with both low nSES and ACP. In this study, lower nSES was associated with lower ACP documentation after adjusting for health care use. Using EHR and place-based data, communities of older adults with both low nSES and low ACP were identified. This is a first step in partnering with communities to develop targeted, community-based interventions to meaningfully increase ACP.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Gomez, Scarlett Lin;Glaser, Sally L.;Satariano, William A.
通讯作者:
Satariano, William A.
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Bravo, Gina;Trottier, Lise;Bellemare, Suzanne
通讯作者:
Bellemare, Suzanne
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Choi, Shinae;McDonough, Ian M.;Kim, Giyeon
通讯作者:
Kim, Giyeon
影响因子:
1.3
作者:
Lee, Mei Ching;Hinderer, Katherine A.;Friedmann, Erika
通讯作者:
Friedmann, Erika
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Eibich, Peter;Krekel, Christian;Wagner, Gert G.
通讯作者:
Wagner, Gert G.