Ethical ‘mess’ in co-produced research: reflections from a U.K.-based case study

Ethical ‘mess’ in co-produced research: reflections from a U.K.-based case study
复制标题

联合研究中的道德“混乱”:英国案例研究的反思

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Helen Thomas
Helen Thomas
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Helen Thomas

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

摘要 联合生产研究是复杂而混乱的。本文借鉴了蒂娜·库克的论点,即在研究账户中系统地纳入“混乱”,作为一个概念框架,通过该框架来阐明共同制作的研究项目中道德混乱的领域。通过叙述“混乱”的伦理复杂性,本文阐述了共同开展研究时的一些具体伦理风险;尤其是在与年轻人一起工作时。该论文对使用共同制作的方法时可能出现的道德紧张局势提供了宝贵的见解,并将为未来研究人员谈判自己的共同制作的研究项目提供信息。该论文主张在参与式研究的核算中系统地纳入混乱情况。
Abstract Co-producing research is complex and messy. This paper draws on Tina Cook’s argument for the systematic inclusion of ‘mess’ in research accounts as a conceptual framework through which to articulate areas of ethical mess from within a co-produced research project. Through narrating the ‘messy’ ethical complications the paper illustrates a number of specific ethical risks when co-producing research; particularly when working with young people. The paper provides valuable insight into ethical tensions that can emerge when using a co-produced methodology and will be informative for future researchers negotiating their own co-produced research projects. The paper argues for the systematic inclusion of mess in the accounting of participatory research.
通过协作、跨学科和不稳定的工作发展反思性身份:早期职业研究人员的经验
DOI: 10.1080/14767724.2016.1199319
发表时间: 2016
期刊: Globalisation, Societies and Education
影响因子: --
作者:
Enright B
通讯作者: Enright B
新自由主义时代的社会正义政治:对斯莱特的答复
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01073.x
发表时间: 2012
期刊: Area
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Pain R
通讯作者: Pain R