The Role of Inhibition in the Regulation of Sequential Action
The Role of Inhibition in the Regulation of Sequential Action
复制标题
抑制在顺序行动调节中的作用
DOI：
10.1111/1467-9280.00268
复制
发表时间：
2000
影响因子：
8.2
通讯作者：
P. Frensch
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Karen Z H Li;U. Lindenberger;Dennis Rünger;P. Frensch
我们使用一种新的范式研究了序列动作的调节。参与者学习了一系列的七个刺激类别，然后在连续的显示过程中监测它们。所有显示都是这些类别的实例，以伪随机顺序呈现。在每一次试验中，参与者监测类别1的实例，按下计算机键盘上的一个键，然后监测类别2的实例，按下键盘上的一个键，等等所有七个类别。因此，一个完美的试验恰好包含七个反应。入侵错误被分类为从当前序列位置（n）的顺序距离的函数。在近距离的序列位置比远距离的序列位置的侵入错误少，表明侧抑制的梯度。此外，对n + 1个类别的入侵比对n-1个类别的入侵更多，这表明预期目标的可用性比完成的目标更高。与现有的顺序动作模型雅阁，结果表明侧抑制和自抑制是顺序动作调节的重要机制。
We investigated the regulation of sequential action using a new paradigm. Participants learned a sequence of seven stimulus categories and then monitored for them during successive displays. All displays were instances of these categories, presented in pseudorandom order. On each trial, participants monitored for an instance of Category 1, pressed a key on a computer keyboard, then monitored for an instance of Category 2, pressed a key on the keyboard, and so on for all seven categories. Thus, a perfect trial contained exactly seven responses. Intrusion errors were classified as a function of ordinal distance from the current serial position (n). Fewer intrusion errors were made at near serial positions than at far ones, suggesting a gradient of lateral inhibition. In addition, more intrusions were made on n + 1 categories than n − 1 categories, suggesting greater availability of intended than completed goals. In accord with current models of sequential action, the results indicate lateral and self-inhibition as important mechanisms in regulation of sequential action.
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Mayr, U;Keele, SW
通讯作者：
Keele, SW