Rapid-acting antidepressant drugs modulate affective bias in rats.
Rapid-acting antidepressant drugs modulate affective bias in rats.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1126/scitranslmed.adi2403
复制
发表时间:
2024-01-10
影响因子:
17.1
通讯作者:
Robinson ESJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hinchcliffe JK;Stuart SA;Wood CM;Bartlett J;Kamenish K;Arban R;Thomas CW;Selimbeyoglu A;Hurley S;Hengerer B;Gilmour G;Robinson ESJ
How rapid-acting antidepressants (RAADs), such as ketamine, induce immediate and sustained improvements in mood in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) is poorly understood. A core feature of MDD is the prevalence of cognitive processing biases associated with negative affective states, and the alleviation of negative affective biases may be an index of response to drug treatment. Here, we used an affective bias behavioral test in rats, based on an associative learning task, to investigate the effects of RAADs. To generate an affective bias, animals learned to associate two different digging substrates with a food reward in the presence or absence of an affective state manipulation. A choice between the two reward-associated digging substrates was used to quantify the affective bias generated. Acute treatment with the RAADs ketamine, scopolamine or psilocybin selectively attenuated a negative affective bias in the affective bias test. Low, but not high, doses of ketamine and psilocybin reversed the valence of the negative affective bias 24 hours after RAAD treatment. Only psilocybin, but not ketamine or scopolamine, led to a positive affective bias that was dependent on new learning and memory formation. The re-learning effects of ketamine were dependent on protein synthesis localised to the rat medial prefrontal cortex and could be modulated by cue-reactivation, consistent with experience-dependent neural plasticity. These findings suggest a neuropsychological mechanism that may explain both the acute and sustained effects of RAADs, potentially linking their effects on neural plasticity with affective bias modulation in a rodent model.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
11
作者:
Chowdhury GM;Zhang J;Thomas M;Banasr M;Ma X;Pittman B;Bristow L;Schaeffer E;Duman RS;Rothman DL;Behar KL;Sanacora G
通讯作者:
Sanacora G
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Autry, Anita E.;Adachi, Megunai;Nosyreva, Elena;Na, Elisa S.;Los, Maarten F.;Cheng, Peng-fei;Kavalali, Ege T.;Monteggia, Lisa M.
通讯作者:
Monteggia, Lisa M.
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Hinchcliffe JK;Stuart SA;Mendl M;Robinson ESJ
通讯作者:
Robinson ESJ
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Joormann, Jutta;Vanderlind, W. Michael
通讯作者:
Vanderlind, W. Michael
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Goodwin, Guy M.;Aaronson, Scott T.;Malievskaia, Ekaterina
通讯作者:
Malievskaia, Ekaterina