What Drives Students to Office Hours: Individual Differences and Similarities

What Drives Students to Office Hours: Individual Differences and Similarities
复制标题

是什么促使学生参加办公时间:个体差异和相似之处

DOI:
10.1145/3545945.3569777
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Stephens-Martinez, Kristin
Stephens-Martinez, Kristin
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ko, Shao-Heng;Stephens-Martinez, Kristin

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本科生助教(UTAS)办公时间是学生获得帮助的一种容易接近的方式,但人们对学生选择办公时间的原因和目的知之甚少。我们通过分析学生在加入办公时间排队应用时自我报告的问题解决步骤,试图了解学生们认为他们需要什么样的帮助。我们使用UPIC框架汇总课程特定的问题解决步骤,以便能够在四个学期的CS1和数据科学课程的七个数据集之间进行比较。然后,我们比较了班级和学生级的阶段分布,以了解这两门课程之间以及这两门课程中两个水平的差异。我们发现,大多数学生都有一个“初级阶段”,他们的大部分互动都发生在这个阶段,而且他们的阶段分布存在显著的个体差异。此外,我们没有发现学生的人口统计数据或他们第一次访问的背景对他们在阶段分布上的个体差异有显著影响,这表明学生可能对如何接近办公室时间有固定的信念。最后,大多数互动发生在截止日期的3天内,因此这些天的UPIC分布看起来像是班级的阶段分布。
Undergraduate teaching assistants (UTAs) office hours are an approachable way for students to get help, but little is known about why and for what do the students choose to attend office hours. We sought to understand what kind of help the students believe they need by analyzing the problem-solving step students self-reported when joining the office hours queue app. We used the UPIC framework to aggregate course specific problem-solving steps to enable comparing between seven data sets from a CS1 and a data science course across four semesters. We then compared the class-level and student-level phase distributions to understand the differences between the two courses and the two levels in the courses. We found most students have a "primary phase" where a majority of their interactions fall, and there are significant individual differences in their phase distributions. Moreover, we did not find either students' demographics or the context of their first visits to significantly impact their individual differences in the phase distributions, suggesting students may have fixed beliefs on how to approach office hours. Finally, a strong majority of interactions happen within 3 days of the deadline, such that the UPIC distribution for those days looks like the class-level phase distribution.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2019
期刊: International Computing Education Research Workshop
影响因子: --
作者:
Diba Mirza;Phill Conrad;C. Lloyd;Ziad Matni;A. Gatin
通讯作者: A. Gatin
DOI: 10.1145/3478431.3499334
发表时间: 2022-02
期刊: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1
影响因子: --
作者:
Zhi-cun Gao;S. Heckman;Collin Lynch
通讯作者: Zhi-cun Gao;S. Heckman;Collin Lynch
DOI: 10.1145/3488042.3488052
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
影响因子: --
作者:
Augie Doebling;Ayaan M. Kazerouni
通讯作者: Ayaan M. Kazerouni
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Matthew Flatt
通讯作者: Matthew Flatt
DOI: 10.1145/3291279.3339418
发表时间: 2019-07
期刊: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
影响因子: --
作者:
Yanyan Ren;S. Krishnamurthi;Kathi Fisler
通讯作者: Yanyan Ren;S. Krishnamurthi;Kathi Fisler