Effects of park-based interventions on health-related outcomes: A systematic review.

Effects of park-based interventions on health-related outcomes: A systematic review.
复制标题

基于公园的干预措施对健康相关结果的影响:一项系统性综述。

DOI:
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106528
复制
发表时间:
2021-06
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Cohen DA
Cohen DA
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Derose KP;Wallace DD;Han B;Cohen DA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

为了改善人们的健康,包括精神健康,建议增加使用公园进行身体活动。旨在增加公园使用和公园体力活动的干预措施包括以场所为基础的干预措施(如公园翻新)和以人为本的干预措施(如以公园为基础的散步或健身班)。使用《社区指南》中采用的方法,进行了一次系统审查(搜索期至2019年9月),以评估以公园为基础的干预措施在成年人中的有效性。令人感兴趣的主要结果是与健康相关的,包括身体和精神健康以及中等到剧烈的体力活动。2019年和2020年对27项符合审查标准的研究进行了分析。7项基于个人的研究包括一般较小的特定人群样本和干预措施,主要涉及公园内的运动规划;除一项外,所有研究的平均质量评级均为“高”,并且所有研究都至少有一个具有统计学意义的结果。在20个以地点为基础的干预措施中,7个只涉及1到2个公园;然而,7个涉及9到78个公园。干预措施的类型主要是公园翻新;只有5项涉及公园运动规划。大多数翻修都与公园层面的使用和体力活动增加有关,但在那些实施规划的项目中,公园层面的影响较为温和。在以地点为基础的干预研究中,只有不到一半的研究的平均质量评级为“高”。将公园作为体力活动干预场所的研究还处于起步阶段。将基于位置的评估和队列研究相结合的混合方法可以为如何最好地优化政策、规划、设计和管理,以促进健康和福祉提供信息。
Increasing use of parks for physical activity has been proposed for improving population health, including mental health. Interventions that aim to increase park use and park-based physical activity include place-based interventions (e.g., park renovations) and person-based interventions (e.g., park-based walking or exercise classes). Using adapted methods from the Community Guide, a systematic review (search period through September 2019) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of park-based interventions among adults. The primary outcomes of interest were health-related, including physical and mental health and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Twenty-seven studies that met review criteria were analyzed in 2019 and 2020. Seven person-based studies included generally small samples of specific populations and interventions involved mostly exercise programming in parks; all but one had an average quality rating as “high” and all had at least one statistically significant outcome. Of the 20 place-based interventions, 7 involved only 1 or 2 parks; however, 7 involved from 9 to 78 parks. Types of interventions were predominantly park renovations; only 5 involved park-based exercise programming. Most of the renovations were associated with increased park-level use and physical activity, however among those implementing programming, park-level effects were more modest. Less than half of the place-based intervention studies had an average quality rating of “high.” The study of parks as sites for physical activity interventions is nascent. Hybrid methods that combine placed-based evaluations and cohort studies could inform how to best optimize policy, programming, design and management to promote health and well-being.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.015
发表时间: 2013-11
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Cohen, Deborah A.;Han, Bing;Derose, Kathryn Pitkin;Williamson, Stephanie;Marsh, Terry;McKenzie, Thomas L.
通讯作者: McKenzie, Thomas L.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.027
发表时间: 2005-02-01
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Godbey, GC;Caldwell, LL;Payne, LL
通讯作者: Payne, LL
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.029
发表时间: 2016-05
影响因子: 5.1
作者:
Evenson KR;Jones SA;Holliday KM;Cohen DA;McKenzie TL
通讯作者: McKenzie TL
DOI: 10.1001/jama.263.10.1385
发表时间: 1990-03-09
影响因子: 120.7
作者:
DICKERSIN, K
通讯作者: DICKERSIN, K
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181a06c9b
发表时间: 2009-09-01
期刊: MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子: --
作者:
Dunton, Genevieve F.;Berrigan, David;Atienza, Audie A.
通讯作者: Atienza, Audie A.