Absolute identification is relative: a reply to Brown, Marley, and Lacouture (2007).

Absolute identification is relative: a reply to Brown, Marley, and Lacouture (2007).
复制标题

绝对认同是相对的:对 Brown、Marley 和 Lacouture (2007) 的答复。

DOI:
10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.533
复制
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
Stewart N
Stewart N
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stewart N

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

N. Stewart,GDA Brown,and N. Chater(2005)提出了一个绝对识别的相对判断模型(RJM),其中当前刺激相对于前一个刺激进行判断。S. Brown,AAJ Marley,and Y. Lacouture(2007)发现,RJM并不能预测他们在大的刺激跳跃后增加的准确性,除非以牺牲其他效应为代价。事实上,RJM确实预测了核心效应和大幅跳跃后的准确性增加(尽管它低估了这种效应),因为更好的约束参数是从逐个试验的原始数据而不是从汇总图中估计的。此外,一个修改后的RJM,其中的刺激,从两个试验前,有时被用作参考,提供了一个更好的适合。
N. Stewart, GDA Brown, and N. Chater (2005) presented a relative judgment model (RJM) of absolute identification, in which the current stimulus is judged relative to the preceding stimulus. S. Brown, AAJ Marley, and Y. Lacouture (2007) found that the RJM does not predict their finding of increased accuracy after large stimulus jumps, except at the expense of other effects. In fact, the RJM does predict both the core effects and increased accuracy after large jumps (although it underestimates this effect) when better constrained parameters are estimated from the trial-by-trial raw data rather than from summary plots. Further, a modified RJM, in which the stimulus from two trials ago is sometimes used as a referent, provides a better fit.
绝对判断法中的记忆效应。
DOI: 10.1037/h0032753
发表时间: 1972
影响因子: --
作者:
William Siegel
通讯作者: William Siegel
DOI: --
发表时间: 1969
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
N. Durlach;L. Braida
通讯作者: L. Braida
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196847
发表时间: 2004
期刊: Perception & Psychophysics
影响因子: --
作者:
Y. Lacouture;A. Marley
通讯作者: A. Marley
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00797.x
发表时间: 1984-01-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
MARLEY, AAJ;COOK, VT
通讯作者: COOK, VT
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(85)90015-x
发表时间: 1985-01-01
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
TREISMAN, M
通讯作者: TREISMAN, M